CONDITION RED: Marine Defense Battalions in World War II
by Major Charles D. Melson
Organization and Equipment for the Defense Battalion
Envisioned as combined arms teams capable of
delivering intense firepower, defense battalions were expected to have
their greatest impact in the kind of campaign outlined in the Orange
plan. The Navy's seagoing transports provided strategic mobility for the
defense battalions, but once ashore, the units lacked vehicles and
manpower for tactical mobility. Because the battalion became essentially
immobile when it landed, each member had a battle station, as on a ship,
to operate a particular crew-served weapon or other piece of equipment.
As configured in 1939 and 1940, a defense battalion could achieve
mobility on land only by leaving its artillery, searchlights, and
detection gear and fighting as infantry.
Marine Corps defense battalions could operate as
integral units in support of a base or beachhead, positioning their
weapons and equipment to cover assigned sectors and meet specific
threats. Moreover, they might form detachments with a size and armament
suitable for a particular task, such as defending various islets within
an atoll or protecting separate beachheads. Although relatively static
when in place, the ability of the battalions to divide in this fashion
provided a kind of flexibility that may not have been fully appreciated
in 1939, when the basic concept placed one battalion, though of variable
size, at a given place.
|
MajGen Charles D. Barrett, while a colonel, together
with LtCol Robert H. Pepper, played a major role in the development of
the defense battalion. Department of Defense photo (USMC) 61403
|
Because a defense battalion could, in effect, form
task organizations, it somewhat resembled the larger infantry regiment,
which could employ battalion combat teams. According to Lieutenant
Heinl, in terms of "strength and variety of material," the defense
battalion "might well be a regiment. Actually, the seacoast and
antiaircraft artillery groups are almost small battalions, while the
other three separate batteries (search light and sound locator and the
two machine gun units) are undeniable batteries in the accepted sense of
the word."
Despite the lieutenant's enthusiasm for the defense
battalions, they had definite weaknesses, particularly in infantry and
armor for mobile reserves in the event of a large-scale enemy landing.
The failings, however, seemed acceptable to the General Board of the
Navy roughly comparable to the War Department's General Staff
which felt that the battalions could nevertheless protect
outlying bases against raids by aircraft, ships, and comparatively small
landing parties. Concern that the defense battalions, in their current
configuration, might not be able to repulse more ambitious hostile
landings caused the Marine Corps to debate, during the spring of 1941,
the feasibility of creating separate infantry battalions to fight
alongside the defense units.
The proposed 850-man infantry battalions would
forestall any possible need to detail infantrymen from the regiments to
reinforce the defense battalions. Consequently, Secretary of the Navy
Frank Knox approved the creation of separate infantry battalions to
serve with the defense battalions. After the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor, the regiments and divisions and for a time the
specialized units such as the raiders demanded a lion's share of
manpower, and with few exceptions, the defense battalions had to fend
for themselves without the planned infantry battalions, though
occasionally with an organic rifle company. Every Marine in a typical
defense battalion had to train to fight as an infantryman in an
emergency, with the members of gun and searchlight crews leaving their
usual battle stations. Rifle companies served at various times with the
6th, 7th, and 51st Defense Battalions, and such a component was planned
for the 52d, but not assigned. Those battalions that included a company
of infantry bore the title "composite."
Improvements in equipment, a changing strategic
situation, and deployment in areas that varied from desolate coral
atolls to dense jungle ensured that no single table of equipment or
organization could apply at all times to every defense battalion. Each
of the organizations tended to be unique "one of a kind," as a
battalion's history stated. Weapons and personnel reflected a unit's
destination and duties, much as a child's erector set took the shape
dictated by the person assembling the parts, or such was the view of
James H. Powers, a veteran of the 8th Defense Battalion. The selection
and assignment of men and equipment proved a dynamic process, as units
moved about, split into detachments, underwent redesignation, and traded
old equipment for new. Much of the weapons and material came from the
stocks of the U.S. Army, which had similarly equipped coast and
antiaircraft artillery units. The first 155mm guns dated from World War
I, but the Army quickly made modern types available, along with new 90mm
antiaircraft guns that replaced the 3-inch weapons initially used by the
defense battalions. In addition, the Army provided both primitive
sound-ranging equipment and three types of Signal Corps radar the
early-model SCR268 and SCR270 and the more advanced SCR268, which
provided automatic target tracking and gun-laying.
By October 1941, the tables of organization for the
new defense battalions had certain features in common, each calling for
a headquarters battery, a sound-locator and searchlight battery, a
5-inch seacoast artillery group, a 3-inch antiaircraft group, and a
machine-gun group. The specific allocation of personnel and equipment
within each battalion depended, however, on where the battalion deployed
and the changes "prescribed by the Commandant from time to time." In
brief, the defense battalions adhered to certain standard
configurations, with individual variations due to time and circumstance.
The average battalion strength during the war was 1,372 officers and
men, including Navy medical personnel. Like manpower, the equipment used
by the defense battalions also varied, although the armament of the
typical wartime unit consisted of eight 155mm guns, twelve 90mm guns,
nineteen 40mm guns, twenty-eight 20mm guns, and thirty-five .50-caliber
heavy machine guns, supplemented in some instances by eight M3 light
tanks.
|