BLOODY BEACHES: The Marines at Peleliu
by Brigadier General Gordon D. Gayle, USMC (Ret)
At dusk, Hunt's Company K held the Point, but by then
the Marines had been reduced to platoon strength, with no adjacent units
in contact. Only the sketchy radio communications got through to bring
in supporting fires and desperately needed re-supply. One LVT got into
the beach just before dark, with grenades, mortar shells, and water. It
evacuated casualties as it departed. The ammunition made the difference
in that night's furious struggle against Japanese determined to
recapture the Point.
|
The
skies over the landing beaches of Peleliu are blackened with smoke
rising from the ground as the result of the combined naval and aerial
prelanding bombardment, as amphibian tractors rush shoreward carrying
the assault waves. Department of Defense Photo (USMC) 94913
|
The Changing Nature of Japanese Tactics
Japan launched its December 1941 surprise attacks in the
expectation that its forces could quickly seize a forward line of Pacific
and Asian empire. Thereafter, it expected to defend these territories stubbornly
enough to tire and bleed the Allies and then to negotiate a recognization
of Japanese hegemony.
This strategic concept was synchronized with the fanatic
Japanese spirit of bushido. Faith in their army's moral superiority
over lesser races lead the Japanese to expect 19th-century banzai
tactics to lead invariably to success. Expectations and experience meshed
until their 1942 encounters with the Allies, particularly with Americans in
the Solomons. Thereafter, it took several campaigns to internalize the lessons
of defeat by modern infantry weapons in the hands of the determined Allies.
To Americans, these Japanese misconceptions were alarming,
but cost-effective. It was easier, and less costly, to mow down banzai
attacks than to dig stubborn defenders out of fortified positions.
By spring of 1944, the lessons had permeated to the highest
levels of Japan's army command. When General Hideki Tojo instructed General
Inoue to defend the Palaus deliberately and conservatively, he was bringing
Japanese tactics into support of Japanese strategy. Henceforth, Japanese
soldiers would dig in and hunker down, to make their final defenses as costly
as possible to the attacking Americans.
|
The next afternoon, Lieutenant Colonel Raymond G.
Davis' 1/1 moved its Company B to establish contact with Hunt, to help
hang onto the bitterly contested positions. Hunt's company also regained
the survivors of the platoon which had been pinned at the beach fight
throughout D-Day. Of equal importance, the company regained artillery
and naval gunfire communications, which proved critical during the
second night. That night, the Japanese organized another and heavier
two companies counterattack directed at the Marines at the
Point. It was narrowly defeated. By mid-morning, D plus 2, Hunt's
survivors, together with Company B, 1/1, owned the Point, and could look
out upon some 500 Japanese who had died defending or trying to re-take
it.
|
Marines and corpsmen scramble ashore and seek any cover
they can to escape the incoming murderous enemy mortar and artillery
fire. Behind them, smoking and abandoned, are amphibian tractors which
were hit as they approached the beach
|
To the right of Puller's struggling 3d Battalion, his
2d Battalion, Lieutenant Colonel Russell E. Honsowetz commanding, met
artillery and mortar opposition in landing, as well as machine-gun fire
from still effective beach defenders. The same was true for 5th Marines'
two assault battalions, Lieutenant Colonel Robert W. Boyd's 1/5 and
Lieutenant Colonel Austin C. Shofner's 3/5, which fought through the
beach defenses and toward the edge of the clearing
looking east over the airfield area.
On the division's right flank, Orange 3, Major Edward
H. Hurst's 3/7 had to cross directly in front of a commanding defensive
fortification flanking the beach as had Marines in the flanking position
on the Point. Fortunately, it was not as close as the Point position,
and did not inflict such heavy damage. Nevertheless, its enfilading
fire, together with some natural obstructions on the beach caused
Company K, 3/7, to land left of its planned landing beach, onto the
right half of beach Orange 2, 3/5's beach. In addition to being out of
position, and out of contact with the company to its right, Company K,
3/7, became intermingled with Company K, 3/5, a condition fraught with confusion
and delay. Major Hurst necessarily spent time regrouping his separated
battalion, using as a coordinating line a large anti-tank ditch astride
his line of advance. His eastward advance then resumed, somewhat delayed
by his efforts to regroup.
|
Situated in a cave overlooking the airfield is this
heavy caliber Japanese antiboat gun. It had a field of fire which
included the invasion beaches and the airfield. Caption and photograph
by Phillip D. Orr
|
|
Damaged heavily in the D-Day bombardment, this Japanese
pillbox survives on the southern promontory of White Beach. Now vacant,
its gun lies on the beach. Caption and by Phillip D. Orr
|
Naval Gunfire Support for Peleliu
In their earlier operations, especially at
Guadalcanal, the primary experience of 1st Division Marines with naval
gunfire was at the receiving end. On New Britain, the character and
disposition of Japanese defenses did not call for extensive pre-landing
fire support, nor did subsequent operations ashore. The naval gunfire to
which the Guadalcanal veterans were exposed frequently and heavily
damaged planes and installations ashore. Its effect upon dug-in Marines
was frightening and sobering, but rarely destructive.
During the planning for Peleliu, the division staff
initially had no trained naval gunfire (NGF) planner. When one arrived,
he was hampered by the cumbersome communications link back to higher
headquarters, Lieutenant General Holland M. Smith's Fleet Marine Force,
Pacific (FMFPac), in Honolulu, which would provide the essential
targeting information for the division's NGF plan. FMFPac also would
plan and allocate the available gunfire resources to the targets deemed
important by the division staff's planners. The preoccupation of FMFPac
with the ongoing Marianas campaigns, as well as illness on the staff of
Rear Admiral Jesse B. Oldendorf, Commander, Naval Gunfire Support Group,
further limited and constrained the preparations. Heavy ammunition
expenditures in the Marianas reduced ammunition availability for
Peleliu.
Surprisingly, during the delivery of U.S. preparatory
fires, there was no Japanese response. This prompted Oldendorf to report
all known targets destroyed, and to cancel preparatory fires scheduled
for D plus 3. An unintentional benefit of this uncoordinated change in
naval gunfire plan may have resulted in there being more shells
available for post-landing NGF support. But the costliest effect of
inadequate NGF was that the flanking positions north and south of the
landing beaches were not taken out. The selection of naval gunfire
targets could certainly have been done with more careful attention.
Colonel Lewis B. Puller, the 1st Marines commander, had specifically
asked for the destruction of the positions dominating his landing on the
division left flanks. Failure to do so was paid for in blood, courage,
and time during the critical battle for the Point.
|
Department of
Defense Photo (USMC) 95115
|
Subsequent to D-Day there were numerous instances of
well-called and -delivered naval gunfire support: night illumination
during the night of 15-16 September, the destruction of two major
blockhouses earlier reported "destroyed," and effective support of the
Ngesebus landing toward the end of the battle.
|
Any delay was anathema to the division commander, who
visualized momentum as key to his success. The division scheme of
maneuver on the right called for the 7th Marines (Colonel Herman H.
Hanneken) to land two battalions in column, both over Beach Orange 3. As
Hurst's leading battalion advanced, it was to be followed in trace by
Lieutenant Colonel John J. Gormley's 1/7. Gormley's unit was to tie into
Hurst's right flank, and re-orient southeast and south as that area was
uncovered. He was then to attack southeast and south, with his left on
Hurst's right, and his own right on the beach. After Hurst's battalion
reached the opposite shore, both were to attack south, defending Scarlet
1 and Scarlet 2, the southern landing beaches.
At the end of a bloody first hour, all five
battalions were ashore. The closer each battalion was to Umurbrogol, the
more tenuous was its hold on the shallow beachhead. During the next two
hours, three of the division's four remaining battalions would join the
assault and press for the momentum General Rupertus deemed
essential.
(click on image for an enlargement in a new window)
|
Following close behind Sabol's 3/1, the 1st Marines'
Colonel Puller landed his forward command group. As always, he was eager
to be close to the battle, even if that location deprived him of some
capacity to develop full supporting fires. With limited communications,
and now with inadequate numbers of LVTs for follow-on waves, he
struggled to ascertain and improve his regiment's situation. His left
unit (Company K, 3/1) had two of its platoons desperately struggling to
gain dominance at the Point. Puller's plan to land Major Davis' 1st
Battalion behind Sabol's 3/1, to reinforce the fight for the left flank,
was thwarted by the H-hour losses in LVTs. Davis' companies had to be
landed singly and his battalion committed piecemeal to the action. On
the regiment's right, Honsowetz' 2/1 was hotly engaged, but making
progress toward capture of the west edges of the scrub which looked out
onto the airfield area. He was tied on his right into Boyd's 1/5, which
was similarly engaged.
In the beachhead's southern sector, the landing of
Gormley's 1/7 was delayed somewhat by its earlier loses in LVTs. That
telling effect of early opposition would be felt throughout the
remainder of the day. Most of Gormley's battalion landed on the correct
(Orange 3) beach, but a few of his troops were driven leftward by the
still enfilading fire from the south flank of the beach, and landed on
Orange 2, in the 5th Marines' zone of action. Gormley's battalion was
brought fully together behind 3/7 however, and as Hurst's leading 3/7
was able to advance east, Gormley's 1/7 attacked southeast and south,
against prepared positions.
Hanneken's battle against heavy opposition from both
east and south developed approximately as planned. Suddenly, in
mid-afternoon, the opposition grew much heavier. Hurst's 3/7 ran into a
blockhouse, long on the Marines' map, which had been reported destroyed
by pre-landing naval gunfire. As a similar situation later met on
Puller's inland advance, the blockhouse showed little evidence of ever
having been visited by heavy fire. Preparations to attack and reduce
this blockhouse further delayed the 7th Marines' advance, and the
commanding general fretted further about loss of momentum.
|