Podcast logo for Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of The Civil War Era

Podcast

Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era

Kentucky during the Civil War was a battleground over which the Nation struggled to define itself in the face of slavery, emancipation, and civil rights. Join us as we explore this complicated legacy through episodes in the history of Camp Nelson National Monument.

Episodes

Season 1

2. Irregular Warfare in Kentucky with Derrick Lindow

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration -:-
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -:-
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected

      Transcript

      0:0 Steve Phan: Welcome to the park podcast, Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era, at Camp Nelson National Monument. My name is Steve Phan, and I serve as the Chief of Interpretation, Education, and Visitor Services. This is the second episode of the podcast, and we’re thrilled to launch a new, digital series to connect visitors to the national significance of Camp Nelson during the Civil War era and our development as the 418th unit of the National Park Service. The podcast will feature unique and interesting stories, interviews with subject matter experts, and an assortment of other topics.

      The podcast launches with the 4th annual Winter Lecture Series. The interview provides an overview of the Winter Lecture Series presentation delivered by special guests at the park. 2025 marks the 4th annual Winter Lecture Series and the 160th anniversary of Camp Nelson.

      On June 13, 1864, the U.S. War Department issued General Orders Number 20, which authorized the unrestricted enlistment of African American men in the U.S. Army and established 8 recruiting and training centers in Kentucky at Bowling Green, Camp Nelson, Covington, Lebanon, Louisville, Louisa, Owensboro, and Paducah. General Orders Number 20 codified Camp Nelson’s dramatic and evolutionary transformation from supply depot to recruitment and training center for over 10,000 African American men and a site of refuge for thousands of freedom seekers.

      The U.S. Army was authorized to recruit, enlist, and train U.S. Colored Troops in, quote, “as rapidly as possible,” end quote. At war’s end, nearly 24,000 African American men joined a U.S.C.T. regiment organized in Kentucky, and thousands of freedom seekers self-emancipated at U.S. Army bases across the Commonwealth.

      However, the process of emancipation through black enlistment was complicated, contested, and deadly. Black enlistment and the subsequent destruction of the institution of slavery added fuel to an already chaotic breakdown of civil and military order in Kentucky, and was marked by the rise of irrever… irregular combat, guerrilla activity, extralegal violence, and open hostility to the Lincoln administration, federal government, and the U.S. military. Opposition came in many forms and included many white Kentuckians, including elected officials and even U.S. Army officers and soldiers.

      So how did we get here? Let’s find out.

      Our speaker today is Derrick Lindow, who is an 8th grade U.S. history teacher in Owensboro, Kentucky. He is the author of We Shall Conquer or Die: Partisan Warfare in 1862 Western Kentucky, which was published by Savas Beatie in March of 2024, and he also runs The Western Theater in the Civil War website. He has a Bachelor's degree in history from Kentucky Wesleyan College and a Master’s in history from Western Kentucky University. Derrick is married to Allie, and the two have two boys: Ezra and Owen.

      So the program that he delivered today is, uhm, an expansion of the work that he published last year, and this is the program description: “Irregular warfare in Kentucky saw drastic changes from 1862 through 1865. In the earlier stages of the war, there was much more civility and a respect toward the rules of war and non-combatants. By 1864 and into 1865, the brutality of guerrilla war seemingly touched every corner of the state and affected everyone from civilian Unionists, returning Union veterans, United States Colored Troops, Freemen, and sometimes, even Confederate sympathizers. Exactly how were the stages of irregular warfare different in Kentucky, and what brought about the drastic changes?”

      That’s what I’ll be discussing with Derrick today. Welcome, Derrick, it’s nice to have you join us.

      Derrick Lindow: Thanks for having me.

      Steve Phan: Before we discuss your book and the presentation at the park, tell our listeners more about The Western Theater in the Civil War website.

      4:35 Derrick Lindow: Glad to. So, I guess back in 2020, back when Covid was going on and we had nothing else to do but be on the internet, Darryl Smith and I, we decided that there needed to be something just for the Western Theater. And so we… we made the website, uh, it’s westerntheatercivilwar.com, and we’ve, uh, nearing 300 blog posts on there. We do events, try to do one or two a year. Lately, Perryville has been our annual event. We do a symposium there every year that lasts three days. And, uh, it’s tours for certain brigades or certain topics and, uhm, you know, all over the battlefield and that’s been our main one that we’ve been going lately. But we’ve…every now and then we’ll add some other little events in there, and our goal is just to bring more attention to the Western Theater and, really, just the amazing stories that happened out here and how important this area of the war was to the conclusion of everything.

      Steve Phan: And I’ve seen your popularity with this website and the work you’re doing with the programs grow pretty rapidly over the past couple years. So, what’s that been like for you and Darryl?

      5:35 Derrick Lindow: Uh, sometimes it’s like another job. Honestly, it’s, uh, uhm… you know, last… this last past year was probably the least amount that we were able to put into it because I was moving and we were building a house, and then school started back up and kids doing things. And so it kind of took a dip, but it’s jumping back up there now. We’ve, uh, found the time to be able to hit hard again and, uh, start putting more stuff out there. We’re always looking for writers, so if somebody has a Western Theater topic and, uh, you’ve done some good research, then, you know, we’d be happy to take a look at that.

      Steve Phan: And I must confess in a very positive way that whenever I’m doing some sort of reading or writing about the Western Theater, especially Civil War Kentucky, I generally send a message to Derrick and Darryl and be like, “Is this right? Am I accurate?” So I obviously appreciate, uh, your support of Camp Nelson and the work that we’re doing here as well.

      And I think this is a great transition to my next thought about this. From my perspective as Civil War historian, Kentucky has existed on the periphery of Civil War era scholarship and public interest and focus. But that appears to be changing with the preservation of sites like Camp Nelson and Mill Springs, together with other Civil War sites across the state, and the publication of new scholarship, including your new book, We Shall Conquer or Die. Uh, what are your thoughts on this growing, perhaps, attention to the scholarship and preservation happening in Kentucky?

      Derrick Lindow: I think it’s amazing. Uh, just the more that we can bring to these sites, and to the stories of the people that fought there or lived there, uh, I think it’s exactly what we need. Uhm, especially in Kentucky, because, you know, a lot of these sites are just…a lot of them are just roadside signs, historical markers. Uh, but I think as we research more, as we get more stories out there and, uh, find more information, then maybe one day we can start getting even more sites. And that will help the others that we already have. And, uh, that people’s interests will really start to pique and that, you know, realize just how important Kentucky was during the war. It wasn’t just a one and done with Perryville and then Kentucky’s done with the war. I mean it was…there was a whole lot of things going on. And, you know, Camp Nelson is one of the perfect examples of that, so…

      7:41 Steve Phan: And that really, I think, lends well to the topic of your work, especially with We Shall Conquer or Die. What was your inspiration for writing that?

      Derrick Lindow: It started with a…it was almost just like a passionate project. Uh, it took place–one of the main events took place in Owensboro and, uh, you know, as a kid growing up and just being obsessed with Civil War history, I always wanted to know what exactly happened there. We didn’t really have internet growing up, but once we got it, I started googling–if that was even a word back then in the early 2000s, I don’t know– but I was trying to look up anything I could on it and there was absolutely nothing. There really wasn’t a whole lot written about it either. And so, several years ago, I decided that I was…if no one else was gonna do it, I’ll do it. And so I started researching and, uh, started finding a lot of interesting stories and bits of information and realized after a few months of research that this is not gonna just be a little pamphlet from our local library–which was what I originally planned for it to be. And, you know, there’s a whole lot of material here and it’s connected to so many other events. And this could be something book length, and that’s what it turned into.

      Steve Phan: For those listening for the first time or maybe this is the first time they’ve heard about your book, give them, uh, maybe just an overview of the work that you did there. 9:00 Derrick Lindow: Yeah, so what I’m focusing on is, uh, partisan warfare, which is oftentimes mixed up with guerrilla warfare, but the book is careful to, I guess, explain the differences between that. And it follows the partisan activities of one Confederate regiment–the 10th Kentucky Partisan Rangers–and… because they were the ones that were really doing all the partisan activity in western Kentucky, in that part of 1862. So it follows them and how they are, uh, just wreaking havoc behind Union lines. And the book looks into, you know, how does this unit organize? How does it arm itself? How does it supply itself? How does it function?

      And then how does the Union Army figure out how to defeat them? Uh, because they struggle with that. And it’s almost like they’re learning by doing. And so the more mistakes they make, they actually are learning, and they stop making a lot of those mistakes. And eventually, they’re able to figure out and they push Johnson and his 10th KY Partisan Rangers out of the state.

      Steve Phan: So Derrick, when we talk about Civil War Kentucky in 1862, obviously we’ve got Munfordville, we’ve got…I guess you would start with Mill Springs and then Munfordville. And then we’ve got Richmond and the capture of Frankfort by the Confederate Army. We’ve got, of course, culminating in the biggest battle in the state in Perryville. What is… what’s happening in western Kentucky in 1862?

      10:18 Derrick Lindow: Yeah, there’s a… there’s a lot of questions. Uh, people asking, you know, how…how safe am I? Uh, because sometimes it’s getting to the point where, can I trust my neighbors? Because, you know, in town there are, in most cities, there are some divided loyalties, very strongly divided loyalties. And you have some people that are taking advantage of this war to settle personal scores, you know, just because you had a problem with somebody before the war, and now you have an opportunity to get at them. Uh, people were taking advantage of that.

      But there is very few Union Army, uh, regiments or units operating in that part of the state. Uhm, they’ve all been really pulled south and so it left it open, almost just…almost like a vacuum. And so the Confederate Army recognizes that that’s a prime area to do some recruiting and to, uh, really start to, hopefully, mess up the plans of the Union Army and inhibit their ability to do things where the main armies are actually marching and fighting, so they take advantage of that.

      Steve Phan: So if our listeners were to visit western Kentucky, are there Civil War sites for them to see and experience?

      Derrick Lindow: Uh, there’s a few. Uhm, so the sites that are, uhm, I guess, they have to do with the book… So in Owensboro there is a, uh, I call it the battlefield when I talk about going there, it’s really just a field, uhm, and an elementary school. Where part of the battle was fought, they built an elementary school there, but there’s still a huge field in the front yard and, uhm, you know, I guess halfway preserved in a way. And then across the road from there, a very busy road, there is another really big hill, it’s just a cornfield and I guess you could say that’s… that is preserved, it’s just farmed every year and owned by some kind of farming corporation, so…. I would love to figure out what remains there and, uh, see if there’s any secrets that we don’t know about.

      But that’s something that people can visit. There is a historical marker there. There is a little stone monument that the UDC put up back in the 1930s. Uh, they actually own that little…there’s a little bitty spot of land where they placed that and they actually own that. But then there’s some other spots, uh, where there’s… Sacramento in McLean County that was Forrest’s first battle, uhm, in 1861, and that’s…there’s a reenactment there every year. And so they’ve…the city there bought, or the county bought, a large portion of land down there and they use that as the battlefield and part of the fight was there.

      But any of these other little fights and skirmishes, there’s… there’s not like a… you’re not gonna find a visitor center or you might not even find even a lot of information on it, except for just the historical marker itself. Uh, there’s not really, you know… there’s not any Civil War trail signs, uhm, in Kentucky. Maybe one day we can get some out there.

      Steve Phan: That would be wonderful.

      Derrick Lindow: It would and I mean, I think that would really help people understand just how much was happening right in their backyard. Because when people look at this map of the Civil War and they look at the battles, nothing is close to where we are in western Kentucky. But when you start researching, there’s a whole lot of things that were going on.

      13:19 Steve Phan: And obviously for people to learn more, reading the blog posts, right, from the website.

      Derrick Lindow: Oh yeah, yeah. Because we try to get all of those small stories, uh, you know, at the company level or the regimental level. Uhm, you know, what were these people–and we forget about that sometimes, they’re people with lives and experiences–you know, what were they going through? What were they thinking? And a lot of the times, what…how did they handle these situations? Especially things like guerrillas.

      Steve Phan: So We Shall Conquer or Die focuses on partisan warfare in western Kentucky in 1862.

      Derrick Lindow: Mhmm.

      Steve Phan: Your presentation at the park today expanded on this topic to include the impact of irregular warfare, including guerrilla warfare, on all Kentuckians later in the Civil War, including U.S. Colored Troops, freedom seekers, civilian Unionists. And I thought it came fully connected, Derrick, when we talked about Owensboro, where you’re from. And, you know, a lot of your work was focused on that as well. But also that there was a large U.S.C.T. recruitment station there as well.

      Derrick Lindow: Yep, yep. Steve Phan: So share with our listeners the work that you presented on today.

      14:20 Derrick Lindow: Yeah, so what I was talking about was, you know, how did irregular war–and when I say irregular, I mean partisan rangers, I mean raiders, guerrillas, your bushwhackers, and just really your outlaws–like all of that is kind of thrown into the irregular box, I guess you could say. Uh, but they’re different types of irregular warfare. And so what I was showing was, you know, in 1862 it was partisan war, where you had partisan rangers and they, uhm, they were official Confederate soldiers. They swore oaths to the Confederate Army, they enrolled, uhm, they organized into regiments and companies and officers that had commissions, so they were regular army units. But they just operated behind Union lines.

      But the people at the time, and even today, they didn’t understand that they were actual, legitimate soldiers, and so they just called them guerrillas. And, even, you know, Morgan is called a guerrilla when, you know, he wasn’t a guerrilla. And so we… we kinda were looking at just how that changed. Because the partisan war was…was not so brutal as the guerrilla war that takes off in ‘64. And so, uhm, how that comes about is, you know, the state pretty much gets drained of most of the Union soldiers that were, uhm…that were stationed there. And with the thousands of men they had in Kentucky, it really kept…I guess you can say it kept the peace.

      Uhm, but as those troops are being pulled out for all these other assignments and these other campaigns that are going on, Kentucky’s left with just a few regiments to garrison the entire state and then your local home guard. And, uhm, that just allows these guerrillas to just thrive, these small bands. Uh, some of these men had been former Confederate soldiers, but then like, for example after the… Morgan’s defeat at Cynthiana, that command just gets scattered and so a lot of these men turn into guerrillas. They don’t go back to the army. They don’t really make any effort to. And, uh, they decide they’re going to have their own little small bands and they are going to start doing a lot of bad things.

      Uh, some of those are… some of the things they do are military in nature. They’ll burn a bridge that the army, Union Army, might use to transport supplies. But then they’re doing other things, like they’re stealing, they’re murdering. They’re targeting certain people and Unionists, uh, Union veterans. Union veterans, a lot of them are re-enlisting at the end of the war because it’s the only safe place for them to be, because if they go home there’s a really good chance that five or six, seven guerrillas show up and something bad would happen. So, uhm you know, those men are being targeted.

      And then, of course, you know, the African…the African Americans that are joining up for these U.S.C.T. regiments, where this is… that’s something that really shows an explosion in this guerrilla violence. Where the more that the recruitment takes place, the more the violence that you start to see and especially in the newspapers and in the official records.

      Steve Phan: Can you share more of those accounts? I thought it was really powerful that you were sharing, like, the accounts of specific soldiers or communities, uh, especially where you see the growing number of African Americans enlisting in the U.S. military and the reaction, right.

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah.

      Steve Phan: Talk about that, Derrick.

      17:19 Derrick Lindow: Yeah, so one example is, uh, Color Corporal, uh, Weir, uh… He was from Muhlenberg County, uh, Kentucky. Uh, it’s… it’s… there’s one county between Muhlenberg County and Daviess County, where Owensboro is. And Owensboro is one of these recruitment centers. And so he got permission of his owner to enlist, and he does and becomes, you know, the Color Corporal. And there’s a great image of him holding the flag. And he enlists in Owensboro and, uhm, he…in the 108th U.S. Colored Infantry. And, uh, there’s an account that’s in the newspaper where, uh, a company of the regiment is sent out to… it doesn’t really say what they’re out there doing. But they go out to a certain part of the county, and as they’re returning to Owensboro, they are passing through a little area called Yelvington, and Yelvington is also on the Ohio River, uhm, right across from Spencer County, where Abraham Lincoln grew up, uhm, which…

      Steve Phan: In Indiana, correct?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah. So it’s, you know… these very pro-secessionist areas just miles away from, you know, President Lincoln grew up. And he… did he know some of these people? I don’t know. Uhm, but as they’re going through Yelvington, you know, this place is called the, uh, the Charleston of Daviess County, uh, just because of this pro-Confederate attitude that they have. And so as this company is marching through it, the newspapers said that there was a skirmish with some guerrillas and civilians that were there in Yelvington. So the violence that takes place is not just with the guerrillas, you have sometimes just regular civilians. They’re going to take an opportunity to shoot at…at a… someone in the U.S.C.T. regiment because they hate seeing the fact that, uh, you know, these men who, a lot of them are former slaves, are now, uhm, helping free other slaves. And that is something that is just infuriating so many of these people.

      Steve Phan: And how was the U.S. military, the state government, going to respond to this? Uh, we shared with visitors at the park today that Lincoln will issue, uh, orders to declare Kentucky under martial law in July of 1864. But from Lincoln all the way down to Governor Thomas Bramlette to General Burbridge to General Palmer, right, these commanders of Kentucky, how is the U.S. military responding to this rise of guerrilla warfare?

      19:34 Derrick Lindow: Pretty harshly. Uhm, and… there’s, you know, some orders put out that if there is some sort of guerrilla depredation that takes place, any known rebel sympathizer, I think within like 5 miles radius, is going to be removed from their home. And there’s another order that comes out where if a Union man is killed by a guerrilla or any Union citizen is killed by a guerrilla, then 4, uhm, Confederate prisoners, probably guerrillas, are going to be executed near the place where the original, uhm, crime took place. Uh, so they are responding pretty harshly.

      And, uhm, that sort of… the revenge violence, I guess you could say, is something that is difficult for a lot of people to swallow because there’s a lot of accusations made, uhm, that certain people are guerrillas. And… were they really guerrillas? You know, they deny that they were. Uhm, and so the fact that you have people being shot, people are losing their property, especially in a Union state that was loyal. And a lot of these people may have originally been Unionists because they thought staying in the Union was the best way to preserve slavery.

      And the support they start to have for the Union really starts to go away with, uhm… They’re mad at the guerrillas. They’re mad at the Union response. They’re mad at the recruitment of African Americans. Uhm, they’re just upset about being treated like they’re one of the Confederate states, uh, that rebelled. And, uhm, you know, they’re just… there’s a lot of angry sentiment towards…towards the state government, U.S. government, just everybody in general.

      Steve Phan: So we see guerrilla warfare. We see retaliation by the U.S. military. I mean… so what is the landscape looking like in 1864 and 1865? It seems, from everything that’s been shared by historians, the work that you’re doing, it was chaotic, wasn’t it?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah, uhm, I’ve heard that it turned into anarchy. That’s how some people have explained it. Yeah, it’s just… it’s chaos. You know, there are some counties that are completely under the control of guerrillas, uh, where they have a 3 or 4 county area where it is completely under their control. Where there is no U.S. authority there at all. You know, declaring your loyalty is… can be a dangerous thing, whichever side it is that you’re loyal to. Going by yourself anywhere is dangerous because these guerrillas, they don’t… they don’t care about the war sometimes. Sometimes they just… they just want to rob and steal and murder. And, uhm, which a lot of them take advantage of the chaos of the war to do these things. They really just turn into outlaws that you would see in a Western movie almost. Uhm, so… but yeah it’s a very violent time. And you can find these incidences of violence all over the state. Like it’s not just in one spot, it is… it’s everywhere.

      Steve Phan: Can you share just a couple examples of this violent…these incidences that would, I guess in a way, for our listeners, kind of personify how chaotic and deadly this was?

      Derrick Lindow: Yep. So, uhm, I opened, uhm, today with a story about an Illinois soldier who is recovering from smallpox in Louisville, in one of the hospitals, and he was carrying a report to another hospital. And on the way he was captured by some guerrillas and, supposedly, you know, according to the newspapers, it was Sue Mundy, uhm, Marcellus Jerome Clark is his real name, and they forced… they took his horse, uhm, they took most of his belongings, and they forced him to walk along the road several miles. And then, uhm, in late afternoon, they shot him 5 times and stabbed him twice and left his body in a ravine for the locals to find. And, uh, the only way they found out who he was was because of his letters that were still on him. And some of those letters had been pierced by the bullets that killed him.

      And, uhm… and so I read a letter by the chaplain that is informing this man’s wife, you know, what’s happened to him. It’s ordinarily… earlier in the war, if a Union soldier had fallen to the hands of Confederates, most of the time I feel like it would’ve just been a prisoner or they, a lot of times… they would parole these guys, where they have to go home, can’t fight until they’re properly exchanged. But at this point in time, it’s… they just murdered him. And, uh, you see a lot of stories like that too.

      And then even on the Union side, uhm, if they capture some quote, unquote “guerrillas.” Uh, there was one regiment, the 17th KY Cavalry, where a lot of those men were in the regiment because they couldn’t go home because of the danger. And one newspaper account says that these men were, uhm, very careless with their weapons when guerrillas were near, meaning that they shoot a lot of these guerrillas. And there’s a story with the same regiment where some guerrillas try to escape, those men were all killed. Did they really try to escape?

      Steve Phan: Right, right.

      24:00 Derrick Lindow: And then there’s stories of these other guerrillas doing things in southern Indiana and southern Illinois. And one newspaper says just capture these guys and hand them over to the 17th KY because they know what to do with these men, implying that they’re going to…

      Steve Phan: Yeah, they’re not just going to a military tribunal, right?

      Derrick Lindow: Right.

      Steve Phan: They’re going to take care of them outside of court.

      Derrick Lindow: Yep.

      Steve Phan: I thought it was fascinating… we talk so much about language, right, Derrick? And I love your spectrum of, you know, how we…how you were trying to determine combatants, right? And we see that in primary source records, from newspaper accounts to letters to the U.S. Army itself describing these men as guerrillas, bushwhackers, bandits. I know you came across that word quite often.

      But the life and experience of these guerrillas, either U.S. or Confederate, or Union or Confederate, or something in the middle, they weren’t… they didn’t have a long life expectancy, right?

      Derrick Lindow: No, no.

      Steve Phan: So we’ve got some pretty big names. You mentioned Sue Mundy, uhm, talk about what happens to some of these guerrillas, you know…

      Derrick Lindow: Yep.

      Steve Phan: … in the final stages of the Civil War. I think you mentioned Quantrill. Some of these people were executed months after the end of the Civil War, right?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah, yeah. So most of these… the famous leaders of these guerrilla bands, most of them, they meet, uh… they have an early death. A lot of these guys are in their early 20s, like, you know, Clark–Sue Mundy–he’s, I think, like 20…20 years old. Uhm, I mean that’s really young to be doing these sort of things and leading your own band and being this famous for it. Uhm, and then, uh, one of his, uh, men that was with him all the time–who was actually in command of this little band, was it Clark or was it this guy named Magruder? Uhm, Magruder and Clark are captured at the same time and Magruder is wounded. And they’re taken to Louisville and Mun… Clark is executed within just a couple days, he’s hanged.

      And then Magruder, they bring him back to health and then they execute him, uhm, in October, 1865. And, uhm, so it’s… in somebody like Quantrill, you know, he’s shot and, uh, he’s paralyzed from the chest down. Uh, he’s captured by a Union guerrilla who is a guerrilla hunter, uhm, for the Union Army, and who’s also a pretty bad guy it seems. He brings him to Louisville in a cart and, uh, within…not very much long after that, you know, Quantrill’s dead. And so most of these men, they find untimely deaths. Even, uh, Terrell, the man that shoots and captures Quantrill, he dies. It’s after the war, but it's within just a couple years and it’s a violent death, too. So it’s… violence just seems to follow a lot of these men.

      Steve Phan: I think it was critically important at the end of your program that we talked about what was next. I think with growing scholarship and we see what really happens on the ground for formerly enslaved people, for veterans, for civilians, that Appomattox may have signaled the end of major hostilities for just a couple armies, that the conflict goes on.

      Derrick Lindow: Mhm.

      Steve Phan: Right? So what happens in Kentucky in the months and even years after the end of the Civil War? Because we see a proliferation of violence, right?

      27:05 Derrick Lindow: Mhm. Oh yeah, yeah. So like the war may have ended, the armies might have surrendered, but a lot of these guerrillas, they have no intention of really stopping. And the only way they do stop is when they’re killed. So you see a lot of these men die in 1865, in the spring ‘65. Uhm, it’s… it just seems like that’s when the Union Army is pulling some forces back because they’re not needed in these other places as much and it’s a lot easier to capture them. So yeah, that continues. But the ones that survive, you really see them… it’s almost like the war… the war that they are waging against, uhm, African Americans–especially the ones that are joining and trying to get freedom–that war continues.

      And you see that in, especially in the other lecture that was before mine, you know, talking about all of these depredations that were happening to them in the 1860s, after the war was over and, uhm, how the law was still against them. And you have all these raids and, uh, acts of violence against these free people, and a lot of those people that were committing those were former guerrillas. It’s like the war just didn’t stop for them in that sense.

      Steve Phan: And I think that was really compelling to understand and it, really, lends, uhm, a lot of substance to what happens to a lot of people who freed themselves at Camp Nelson that formed these communities after the Civil War. We’ve got accounts of a lot of U.S.C.T. veterans and their families who tried to make it work in Kentucky into the 1870s, but the proliferation of violence, that… I guess in a way, that it continues after the Civil War. But remember, as we talked about, Kentucky’s not under Reconstruction because it was never…

      Derrick Lindow: Right.

      Steve Phan: …a Confederate state, right? Uhm, which inspired thousands of black Kentuckians to leave the state in the 1870s, including, uh, the so-called Exodusters who ended up in Kansas in the late 1870s. So in conclusion, what’s next for you and your work, Derrick? You working on… I assume you’re working on, uhm, some more scholarship…

      Derrick Lindow: Yep.

      Steve Phan: …some more research? That never ends of course.

      Derrick Lindow: Uh, it never does. It’s… I found so many rabbit holes that I start going down and…. But yeah, I need to just get myself to focus on one thing because there’s so many things I want to just research and get into and write about, and, uh, I’ve gotta just… I’m making myself right now focus on, uhm, really the war that was taking place in Kentucky in ‘61 to ‘62. As the two armies are just staring at each other in Kentucky, I want to know what all was going on during that time because you hear about Mill Springs, you hear about some of the other skirmishes that happened. But otherwise it’s always portrayed as a time where nothing’s happening, really, until the fall of Fort Henry and Fort Donelson and then the armies really start to move.

      But what I’ve been finding is there is constant movement between the sides, constant skirmishes, constant fighting. And it’s… it’s really fascinating to me, you know, how many men were moving through certain areas, uh, areas that you would think of, you know, the war never touched. But in reality, I mean, like little small town Calhoun, Kentucky, on the Green River, you know, Crittenden’s entire division was encamped there for the winter. And they were constantly going out on patrols and they were constantly looking for Confederate cavalry and, uh, rounding up supposed rebels. You know, things that you would think of in ‘64 or ‘65, they were doing that to an extent then too, but it’s… it’s a really, uh, for me just fascinating.

      So I’m hoping to shed some more light on that and, uhm, just kind of bring that time period to life, because as far as I know, I haven’t found a book just on that time period. It’s mentioned in so many others, but I wanted to just focus on that and, you know, what was it like for the men during that time as they’re learning how to be soldiers and learning how to fight?

      Steve Phan: These are the men that are going to be fighting in some of the biggest battles that take place in the Western Theater, right?

      Derrick Lindow: Yep.

      Steve Phan: And these are some big names. You men… I assume that’s Thomas Crittenden?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah, mhm.

      Steve Phan: And, you know, we know him from Stones River and Chickamauga, of course, and George Thomas is in Kentucky, right?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah.

      Steve Phan: Robert Anderson, Felix Zollicoffer, these are some really big names.

      Derrick Lindow: Yep.

      Steve Phan: So we… can you again mention the name of the website so people can learn more about the Western Theater?

      Derrick Lindow: Yeah, sure. So it’s westerntheatercivilwar.com.

      Steve Phan: And we had… of course, had you sign your book at our park today. We’ve got multiple copies. So if you’re in the area and you want to read Derrick’s book, come out to the park and you can purchase one. For those that can’t visit, where can they find your book?

      Derrick Lindow: Uh, you can find it at Savas Beatie. That’s, uh, their website… that’s kind of like the preferred angle. Uhm…

      Steve Phan: So, uhm, can you spell out the name of the website, the Savas Beatie?

      Derrick Lindow: Sure. Uh, savasbeatie.com.

      Steve Phan: Any final thoughts, my friend? I’ve enjoyed this conversation with you.

      Derrick Lindow: I just love being here. I love coming to Camp Nelson. This is my second time being here. And, uhm, I wish the weather was a little better, so I could go explore a little more, but, uh, definitely looking forward to coming back out here. And I just encourage anybody to come visit this place, you know, even if you don’t have much of an interest in the Civil War–which I imagine if you’re listening to this, you probably do. But if you’ve never made it out here, come visit the place. Uhm, you’re… you’re gonna learn a lot and you’re gonna be amazed at the things that happened here.

      Steve Phan: Thanks, Derrick. I really appreciate your time. And as we were just talking about, the Western Theater, Civil War Kentucky, there’s just so much to see and experience all around us, from National Park sites, county, state. Everything from Perryville to Lincoln’s birthday to even the birthplace of Jefferson Davis, right? Of course.

      Derrick Lindow: Right. Yep.

      Steve Phan: And obviously Camp Nelson National Monument. And so I wanted to again thank my friend, historian Derrick Lindow, who joined us today. And that’s a fitting conclusion to our second episode of the park podcast, Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era, at Camp Nelson National Monument. Again I want to thank my friend Derrick for joining us. Uh, to hear previous interviews, please check out the park website at www.nps.gov/cane. Click on the “Learn About the Park” tab and go to photos and multimedia and you’ll see all of our podcast episodes there. You can also find our schedule of events on the calendar, including the 160th Anniversary of Camp Nelson special events that will be coming this year. Thank you for joining us. Cheers to another year of monumental moments at Camp Nelson. Take care.

      Join Ranger Steve as he speaks with Derrick Lindow about irregular warfare in Kentucky during the Civil War.

      1. Slavery and Law in Civil War Kentucky with Cameron Sauers

      Video Player is loading.
      Current Time 0:00
      Duration -:-
      Loaded: 0%
      Stream Type LIVE
      Remaining Time -:-
       
      1x
        • Chapters
        • descriptions off, selected
        • captions off, selected

          Transcript

          0:0 Steve Phan: Welcome to the park podcast, Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era, at Camp Nelson National Monument. My name is Steve Phan, and I serve as the Chief of Interpretation, Education, and Visitor Services. This is our very first episode of the podcast and we’re thrilled to launch a new digital series to connect visitors to the national significance of Camp Nelson during the Civil War Era and our development as the 418th unit of the National Park Service. The podcast will feature unique and interesting stories, interviews with subject matter experts, and an assortment of other topics.

          The podcast launches with the 4th Annual Winter Lecture Series. The interview provides an overview of the Winter Lecture Series presentation delivered by special guests at the park. 2025 marks the 4th Annual Winter Lecture Series and the 160th Anniversary of Camp Nelson.

          Free At Last. In the aftermath of the final expulsion of African American refugees from Camp Nelson on November 23, 1864, the U.S. Army and War Department authorized the establishment of the Home for Colored Refugees at Camp Nelson. The Home will be constructed and developed rapidly in early 1865, and the federal government also changes policy which allows African-American freedom seekers to seek refuge at U.S. bases, camps, and military installations.

          On March 3, 1865, Congress approved, in quotes, “A Resolution to Encourage Enlistments and to Promote the Efficiency of the Military Forces of the United States.” This resolution emancipates the wives and children of U.S.C.T soldiers in Kentucky and across the nation. However, slavery remained legal and protected in Kentucky until ratification of the 13th Amendment on December 6, 1865, 8 months after the end of the Civil War. Why? Let’s find out.

          Our speaker today is Cameron Sauers, a dual title PhD student in the departments of history and African-American and Africa Diasporic studies at Pennsylvania State University, where he currently holds the Raymond H. Robinson Fellowship in American History. Cameron has received the McCabe Scholarship in Civil War History from the Richards Civil War Era Center, and his ongoing dissertation project on child welfare policy in the early American Republic has been supported by the Dickerson Family Fund and the College of Liberal Arts. Prior to his work at Penn State, Cameron completed a Master’s degree in history at the University of Kentucky as the Lipman Fellow just up the street from here at… in Lexington, from us at Camp Nelson National Monument. Uh, so Cameron’s presentation, “The Local Authorities Keep up the Old Machinery of Slavery”: Slavery and the Law in which… in Civil War Kentucky, which explored the legal culture of Slavery in Civil War Kentucky, uh, through an analysis of civil and criminal court cases, as well as pardon petitions sent to the Kentucky Civil War governors. This talk explored the pro-slavery dimensions of pro-slavery Unionism, harsh state-wide policing, excuse me, of challenges to slavery are revealed as a central feature in the political landscape of Civil War Kentucky. The more that Kentuckians struggled to preserve slavery, they reveal the depths of challenges to the system launched by enslaved peoples and the presence of the U.S. Army.

          But understanding how Kentucky’s civil, legal system rooted in the subordination of people of color continued to function amidst Civil War, uh, Cameron’s presentation reveals the central importance of policing and legal rebuke in the maintenance of pro-slavery Unionism.

          So Cameron, it’s great to have you here today, my friend.

          4:07 Cameron Sauers: Thank you, Steve. It’s wonderful to be here.

          Steve Phan: So how does it feel to be back in the Bluegrass after, uh, it’s been about, what?, almost two years since you’ve been back, right?

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, yeah, it’s absolutely wonderful. It’s been great to see Lexington and, and, check in on all the great developments that are happening here at Camp Nelson.

          Steve Phan: So before we discuss the topic that you delivered at the park today, I’d like to share with our listeners the roots of our connection. I've known Cameron since he was a freshman at Gettysburg College, when you were on your way to do your first National Park Service internship at Harper’s Ferry National Historical park and I actually shared with our visitors who attended the program in person today a photograph of Cameron and I together at Fort Stevens, uh, in Washington, D.C., for the Civil War Institute’s summer conference in June of 2018. Uh, as I mentioned, Cameron earned his masters degree at the University of Kentucky, uh, and it’s really exciting that our paths crossed again in Lexington and the Central Bluegrass.

          I am incredibly proud of Cameron and his pursuit of his history career. I truly believe he is one of the brightest young scholars of the 19th century and the Civil War Era. And this is, uh, this is not the last time you’ll hear of his work and scholarship. So, again, it’s great to have you here, my friend. Let’s talk about this presentation you did, this work that you’ve been doing. What inspired you to pursue, uh, this specific topic, uhm, that is, I think, a lot of, even Civil War scholars, including Kentucky Civil War scholars, don’t know the depths of institutionalized slavery in this state?

          5:50 Cameron Sauers: Yeah, absolutely. This came out of, kind of, two roads that intersected in my interests. One is all of the scholarship that exists about how emancipation happened during the Civil War, the long processes. And I’m interested in following the call of some other scholars, like, uhm, my master's advisor, uh, Amy Taylor, to, uh, slow down our history of emancipation and to really pay attention, uhm, to the way it develops, almost on a day-to-day basis.

          And so I’d been thinking a lot about how the process of emancipation happened. Uhm, and I was doing some research and there wasn’t a whole lot of direction to it. Uhm, and in conversation with a friend, uh, came, uh, sent me the documents from the, the trial of a young African-American woman in Louisville, named Caroline, who was accused of murdering the young child of her employer. Uhm, and as I investigated Caroline’s case as a, as a free black woman, uhm, though the court is undecided on whether or not she’s actually free, uhm, I got really engaged in trying to understand, uhm, how black Kentuckians interacted with the law in the Civil War Era, uhm, and it revealed a whole set of documents and events to me, uh, about the struggle to maintain slavery on the… for some individuals, uhm, and the struggle for liberation for others.

          7:14 Steve Phan: So you start with Caroline’s story, and, can you share with listeners why it started with that?

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah. So, so Caroline is en…, she is enslaved at the start of the Civil War in Tennessee. Uh, her enslaver joins, uhm, a Confederate army. So when, in 1862, the Union Army under the command of Don Carolos Buell goes into Tennessee, Caroline encounters them and she is, at that point, through Union policy, considered contraband, which means, uhm, that enslaved people whose enslavers are fighting on behalf of the Confederacy can be kind of, can be seized by federal military officials as part of part of the rules of war.

          Uhm, and so Caroline comes to Louisville with the Army and she finds employment with the Levi family of Louisville, Anne and Willis, and they have a young child named Blanche. Uhm, at the same time, her husband has also come north with her. The details about her husband are, are very few and only in one document. Uhm, but that Levi’s brother who owned an adjoining piece of property had also hired, uh, hires out, uhm, Caroline’s husband while Caroline works for Anne and Willis Levi.

          Uhm, when Willis is about to leave on a boat, uhm, a trip, he’s a boat pilot, uhm, he tries Caroline for some actions she’d recently undertaken, including dirtying the family’s fence, and that she had been spending too much time with her husband and not enough time, uh, working for the family. And, uh, I was really struck by this description of, of Caroline and her husband living as “contraband”, in quotation marks, in a mix that felt neither fully like freedom but was also certainly not enslavement either.

          As I read the case files and continued to go through them, it becomes that Caroline is suspected of the poisoning of Blanche, their… the youngest child, who is about a year old. Uhm, and the court documents refer to Caroline in a number of ways. Uhm, some are just racial descriptions. One document files… is filed under the heading of Commonwealth v. Caroline, comma, a slave, which to me, really struck me. And then another document, uhm, refers to Caroline as a contraband. And what survives doesn’t ever say that the matter was settled, and I don’t think the court considered it a problem. But it ignited a fascination with me in trying to understand how slavery played out under the law of a border state like Kentucky.

          9:37 Steve Phan: And Cameron, we talk so much about language and history, right, and I think starting with Caroline is critically important because I think a lot of Civil War buffs and historians and enthusiasts, they might hear the word Contraband of War, ‘cause it’s so important and it’s used to describe a lot of… a large portion of African-Americans, uh, that were enslaved during the Civil War. And it’s interesting because Caroline is not from Kentucky, but she comes into Kentucky. So in many ways, she is a contraband but, uh, at places like Camp Nelson, we don’t use the word contraband because Kentucky is not in rebellion against the United States. Even at, uh, Camp Nelson, where the Army will impress enslaved people to build fortifications and roads, that is the word that the Army uses, is impressment, because slavery is still legal here, as you mentioned. Contraband of war is property that is seized from the enemy, right? And so, I think… I thought it was brilliant to use Caroline to kind of show the complexities and how confusing this can be.

          You shared with the presentation, with the viewers today, or the attendees, the number of different sources you used. I know you talked about the, the Kentucky governors… war governors project. Let’s start with that, and then, uh, other places where you found, uh, incredible primary search, uh, primary resource documents.

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, so, uhm, the documents, uh, of Caroline’s case came to me through the Civil War Governors of Kentucky project, uhm, which is a program of the Kentucky Historical Society. And what the project does is its digitized and transcribed, and continues to do so, uhm, thousands upon thousands of pages and letters and documents sent to and from Kentucky’s governors during the Civil War Era. There’s a couple of them. And so that was a key source, a significant amount of my material comes from there. And it’s… it’s truly an incredible archive that they have created. And it’s freely accessible online, which was really important for me because I actually did… wrote this presentation while I was in Pennsylvania, and not here in Kentucky.

          I also used documents available from the Kentucky Historical Society, which maintains really wonderful digital collections. Uhm, and I used that to help get an insight into the personal lives and the diaries of some individuals. Uhm, but I’ve also grown to really include newspapers in this project. And not just newspapers in Kentucky. In fact, the title of my presentation comes from a newspaper that’s not in Kentucky, where it’s reporting on what’s happening in the state. And so that for me was an example of, of the way that this became a challenge on the minds of Civil War Americans. That it wasn't just about, it wasn’t just Kentuckians trying to understand Kentucky. But it became to me, through…through newspapers, I came to understand that it was a question, I think, very much about the meaning of the war and what transformations it would enact. So newspapers have become an important source

          12:39 Steve Phan: And that was a Pennsylvania newspaper, is that correct?

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, I think it was a newspaper in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where I… I have family that lives in that area. So I was, kind of, you know, at first, like “oh!”, I’ll look and see what’s in this article, ‘cause there is so much about Kentucky in Civil War Era newspapers. And when I found that they described, uhm, the imprisonment of African Americans in Louisville in 1862, uhm, in 1863 that it describes that the machinery, the legal machinery of slavery, uhm, has continued to function. And that for me was a moment where it gave, you know, of course my project the title, but it also gave a definition as to how I should understand the law that they recognized it as a machine that continued to function, and indeed, my research shows that it very well did.

          Steve Phan: And I find that quite provocative, because, Pennsylvania, Lancaster, right? James Buchanon, John Reynolds, the general that was killed at Gettysburg, these Pennsylvanians that were overwhelmingly pro union in a state that abolished slavery is looking to see what’s happening in Kentucky with the institution of slavery, and you made a great point to talk about… this is not starting in 1861 after Fort Sumpter, this has been building up. So let’s talk about the roots of this system of slavery in Kentucky prior to the Civil War.

          13:54 Cameron Sauers: Yeah, Kentucky like, the United States, it becomes Kentucky’s, you know, from the first settlers, that enslaved people are brought alongside them, and Kentucky continues to have a flourishing number of enslaved people. At the outbreak of the Civil War, there is over 200 thousand enslaved people in Kentucky, which is, at that time, about a fifth of the state’s population, which is really considerable, when you think that one out of every five Kentuckians is enslaved at the start of the Civil War. And Kentucky’s position… it had always been a border state in the sense that it was a boundary between the solid South, where the institution of slavery is really on firm footing and finds its most hearted supporters, and a state like Ohio, which is a free state, and in Ohio there is a number of abolitionists working.

          And so, the boundary between Ohio and Kentucky becomes this, uhm, it becomes this maybe I.. you could say one of the first battlefields of the Civil War as enslaved people see Ohio as a haven of freedom, and they attempt to make the escapes there. Most famously, there’s the case of Margaret Garner, a fugitive enslaved woman who tries to cross the frozen Ohio river in an attempt to elude slave captures, and Garner eventually kills her two year old daughter rather than allow her to be reenslaved, which becomes the basis of a Tony Morrison Novel.

          And thinking about those moments that are dramatic, and there’s other instances of fugitive enslaved people, seeking to self-liberate, being recaptured in Ohio and they’re brought to Kentucky. Many of them are brought to Louisville. Henry Bibb, who writes an incredibly moving memoir about his experience, offers a really detailed description of his flight from Kentucky into Ohio and being returned and imprisoned in Louisville before he’s sold and uhm, sent to the deep South

          16:00 Steve Phan: On nearly a daily basis, Cameron, we meet visitors that come to the park for the very first time, at the front desk, on the grounds, and one of the comments we often hear, or questions, or points, is “Kentucky was a confederate state, right?” And then we have great opportunity to share that this was a pro-Union, pro-slavery state, it was a border state. Explain to our listeners: What is pro-slavery Unionism?

          Cameron Sauers: Pro-slavery Unionism, to me, is the most fascinating political idea at the start of the American Civil War, and Kentucky is a particularly rich place to understand pro-slavery Unionism for the duration of the war, and not just 1860, 1861, where, you know, states like Maryland and Delaware, which are handling things separately, Kentucky remains a pro-slavery Union state through the entire duration of the Civil War and, as you mentioned in the introduction, almost to the very end of the year 1865, and at the core of pro-slavery Unionism and how Kentucky navigates the succession crisis and the outbreak of the Civil War, is their belief that the best way to preserve the institution of slavery, for them, as Kentuckians, is to remain loyal to the Union, and that the federal government would not infringe upon the legal rights of Kentuckians to own enslaved people.

          And so that’s the position that is taken from the very beginning, and it seems through the first year or two of the war, Kentuckians have been vindicated. But, as the battlefields come to Kentucky and there’s the presence of Union and Confederate armies in the state, it really forces the question about the meaning of the Civil War and the Eastern theatre, the contraband quote legislation, that’s really that confiscation acts passed by Congress show that if enslaved people are being used as, kind of, weapons of war as laborers by the confederate army, the US Government would consider them, you know, the materials of war and would seize them.

          And Kentucky, uhm, then, right, Kentuckians respond most forcefully I think to the Emancipation Proclamation. That is when President Lincoln first issues the preliminary Emancipation Proclamation in the Fall of 1862. It’s a sign to Kentuckians that pro-slavery Unionism is going to be an ever narrower tightrope, that to maintain loyalty to the Union would require abandoning slavery, while on the otherhand, to maintain the system of slavery might require abandoning the Union. And it’s a tension that’s never fully resolved, but it’s one that many white Kentuckians who both own enslaved people and do not feel a deep loyalty to the Union, but they also feel a deep loyalty to the institution of slavery.

          18:52 Steve Phan: And it’s… you talked about how deeply embedded it was, not just culturally but legally as well. Obviously slavery was protected by the constitution, but it was also protected by state law, so let’s talk about that Cameron, I mean it was so deep and I think you spoke about it in so much detail and you supplemented with specific cases and individuals. Let's talk more about that.

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, absolutely. So, one of the things that this project revealed to me is just how enmeshed slavery is with all facets of law. It’s not just constitutional, high law like we picture, but it’s also things like contract law, and property law, and even the law that governs ordinary social interactions and social boundaries. So, I showed visitors in the presentation today excerpts from Kentucky’s revised state statutes in the year 1852, which has a chapter dedicated to “Slavery, Freed Persons, and Persons of Color”, is the title of the chapter, and it offers a range of definitions, from how a individual could be considered enslaved, the rules that governed free people of color and their movement, they are strongly policed as well, and as well uhm, instances of crimes that could be committed on behalf of for enslaved people, and for enslaved people there’s a whole host of capital crimes, so crimes where if they were convicted of it, that they would be executed for, but as well as crimes that, if white individuals were convicted of, it was a sign that they had committed a transgression against the system of slavery.

          So one of the ones that stood out to me was so there was a young illiterate boy, he’s aged 16, in 1861, named James Bingham, who is charged with a crime because he was playing marbles with an enslaved man on a Saturday evening. They were working for the same employer. And for me, that was really remarkable because Bingham then turns and writes to Governor McGauffin, asking for a pardon, that he didn’t know it was a crime. And indeed, I don’t think there’s a specific provision against playing marbles, but it was about that it represented a crossing of boundaries, that Bingham, as a young white man, was not supposed to be engaging in something like this. Uhm, more commonly, the most common crime I saw prosecuted was the charge of selling alcohol to enslaved people. It was a very strictly enforced policy.

          Steve Phan: But why was that, Cameron?

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, I think it goes back to a sense of wanting to have control, that both free and enslaved people, their entire lives are policed under the system of slavery, including, too, when and where they could worship or who could preach, where they could live, right, if they were free. And so, I think it becomes about being able to be in control and fears about what a drunken enslaved person could do. It also, I think, demarcates a social boundary in the sense that consuming alcohol could be a leisurely activity and the laws were quite clear that it would be a crime to distribute any sort of alcohol to enslaved people, which, you know, we know Kentucky is the heart of bourbon country, but this offers a really interesting insight into that, that it was… alcohol was not accessible for a significant number of Kentuckians.

          22:38 Steve Phan: So last year we had our dear friend, Dr. Chuck Waschool from the Kentucky Historical Society, and he came to talk about governor Thomas Bramlett and his role with black enlistment, his handling of the state as the governor in the last two years of the Civil War, and I shared with our attendees that when he was inaugurated, he makes this speech about “This day we’ll be resisting confiscation”, and then also, ironically, two of the men that Bramlett enslaved journeyed to Camp Nelson and self-emancipated by joining the US Army, so let’s talk about that major, evolutionary transformation, Cameron, starting in 1864 what place, like Camp Nelson, and African American soldiers themselves and their impact on legal slavery in Kentucky.

          Cameron Sauers: Absolutely. I subscribe to a school of thought, that, central to the destruction of slavery is the actions of enslaved people themselves who pursue self-liberation and Kentucky and a site like Camp Nelson offers us really prime examples of how that happened. As you mentioned, that case, the Breckenridge family.

          23:48 Steve Phan: Share more about that.

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, there is a document available through the Library of Congress, and I actually accessed it through Princeton University’s own project on their University’s history, which the Breckenridges had some connections there, that they, Robert Breckridge I believe, made note of a document that some of the family’s enslaved people had gone to Camp Nelson, and as I was just going through the research, and finding sources, and trying to understand what all of it means, to see the constant references to Camp Nelson or to the federal army, it was really clear that Kentuckians who are pro-slavery see this as an intrusion of the federal government, but enslaved people see it as the government kind of fulfilling the promise of what the war could be.

          And so, for, in that case as you mention, the Bramletts, there is one account by Ellen Wallace, who has a remarkable diary of the Civil War era, that is transcribed and available through the Kentucky Historical Society so listeners can go and detail it, she writes in November of 1862, before Camp Nelson has even opened, about the constant escapes to the federal Army. But when Camp Nelson opens, she makes an immediate account then that more and more enslaved people are fleeing to Camp Nelson, uhm, and as she writes very simply, to get into federal lines and be safe from pursuit. That is the boundary, to be here at Camp Nelson represents a freedom that before was only even tenuous as far North as Ohio.

          25:36 Steve Phan: I think one of the most interesting things that you shared was the account of that Pro-Unionist who was extremely upset with black enlistment–including the loss of his own property, an enslaved person who joined the military–because he kept on talking about the constitution and property rights. Let’s talk more about that, Cameron.

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, so this case you’re referring to is a fascinating one. And I did talk about it at length because, uhm, in part, this individual–his name is S. P. Cope, is what he’s found in the archive as how he identifies himself– he is consistently writing to Governor Bramlette about this instance. So what happened was, uhm, Cope is in his house when four, armed USCT soldiers, complete with muskets and bayonets, arrived at his house and demanded his enslaved person. And that enslaved man is then enlisted into the U.S. military service.

          Cope complains to the federal government, er… Cope complains to Bramlette for intervention, saying he has been made to pay the penalty of rebellion, uhm, this is directly… This is Cope’s language here. I have, quote, “been made to pay the penalty of rebellion by having my right of property violated, the feelings of my wife outraged, my children alarmed by the forcible, insolent, and offensive intrusion upon my premises to drag away my possession, my only remaining servant.”

          In another letter to the governor, uh, Cope writes that, “I staked my all in the cause of the Union of our fathers and now I will give all, if need be, to preserve it, but as a citizen of a free country, and as the birthright of a loyal Kentuckian, I claim that my right of property shall be sacred.” And so, for him, this is very much a case of, of property. It makes little difference to Cope that it’s an enslaved person and not some other piece of property. Uhm, and that was really jarring, because, I think, in a lot of people’s minds, and perhaps my own, we understand that, uhm, the war becomes a war of emancipation as it continues on.

          But for an individual like Cope, his loyalty to Union is really challenged. Here in this letter, he says, “I’m ready to stake my all for the Union cause,” but he’s also quite irate that some of his, what he percei… his property right, has been trampled in this. And it’s, uhm, it’s a tension there between how war and emancipation as a part of that war is conducted and the rights of the individuals. And for pro-slavery, Unionist Kentuckians, it’s about, they emphasize, their rights as individuals over an ultimate outcome of the war.

          28:44 Steve Phan: Cameron, we describe that here at Camp Nelson as “Conditional Unionism.” Would you affirm that or what are your thoughts on that?

          Cameron Sauers: Absolutely! I think “Conditional Unionism” is a great way of describing it. I, in my talk, I tried to emphasize pro-slavery Unionism, because what I wanted to do, uhm, was center that the political decisions being made throughout the war are about the system of slavery and there being transformed by the actions of enslaved people. Uhm, and the condition of that Unionism, as Camp Nelson rightly notes, it is conditional about the system of slavery.

          And for me, it’s a linguistic choice. We talked earlier in the case of Caroline about how that language matters so much. And I think, I think we’re in really strong agreement there that it’s important to emphasize that that Unionism is not a guaranteed promise, right? Abraham Lincoln knows that he could lose Kentucky at any moment. And to lose Kentucky to succession or, whether formalized succession or just political disloyalty, would be a really drastic blow to the Union cause.

          Steve Phan: And this is gonna impact what happens to Kentucky after… obviously after the Civil War, we get into, you know, we call it the era of Reconstruction, even though Kentucky is not officially reconstructed because the state was never in rebellion. But, Cameron, this makes me think about the impact of emancipation on pro-Unionists, uh, and the ones that were also unconditional Unionists as well. I think one of the best examples we have, and we’ve had Brad Asher come and speak about, General Stephen G. Burbridge, who is a native Kentuckian, he also enslaved people before the Civil War. I believe he was a very, uh, he is a pro-slavery Unionist.

          But as the war evolves, so does his thinking about this conflict. And he becomes an ardent, unconditional Unionist to the point where when he becomes the military governor, or the commander, of the district of Kentucky, a lot of conservative Kentuckians want him in command because he is a native Unionist and they believe that he will protect their interests, specifically slavery. When Burbridge starts enlisting African-American men, or at least enforcing black enlistment and going after guerrillas, the state turns against him and they want him out of here. And then now he’s known as this butcher of Kentucky, right? And you know, obviously, we had Derrick Lindlow… Lindow come and talk about the rise of guerrilla warfare and things like that.

          So let’s talk about this legal history of slavery and its impact on, literally, we can talk about within days of the war being over, months, and then years. Let’s talk about, uhm, the outcome of this or the impact that will impact… the impact that will have consequences, especially for black Kentuckians, for literally generations.

          31:30 Cameron Sauers: Yeah, the… considering, just focusing on Kentucky through 1865 really challenged my own view of how the Civil War ends. As you mentioned in your introduction of me, I went to Gettysburg College, so I spent a lot of time on the eastern theater battlefields. And we often write Appomattox as the end of the war and Reconstruction begins. The 13th Amendment is happening. Uhm, except as you rightfully note, Kentucky is exempt from that. And they’re… they’re not going to be reconstructed in the way that South Carolina is. Uhm, and so for Kentuckians, it takes a different tenor.

          For me, the most fascinating individual who comes into Kentucky is, uh, Major General John Palmer, who is sent to Kentucky by President Lincoln. And Palmer writes a fascinating memoir. Uhm, he publishes it, uh, you know, and he calls it “The Story of Earnest Life.” And Palmer, he did not lie about how he perceived himself or what he thought. He described himself as “determined to drive the last nail in the coffin of slavery”, even if it cost him his command. He is very clear.

          Uhm, one of the orders that he issues, to me, which I included, is General Order 13 that ends the usage of private places of confinement. Which, it seems innocuous, “private place of confinement.” But what Palmer is referring to are slave pens, which are jails used by, uhm, traders of enslaved people to hold their human property. Sometimes enslaved people would be placed in municipal jails, uhm, but there was also a widespread number of private prisons used to hold enslaved people. And so Palmer, that’s one his first, uh, that’s one of his actions that, to me, is really significant. It shows the multiple layers of work that are going to need to be done to bring emancipation into Kentucky.

          Uhm, he gives a speech on July 4th, you know, a nationally significant day, where he declares to a gathering of African-Americans in Louisville, “My countrymen, you are substantially free.” Uhm, the declaration doesn't really have authority, even if in spirit it’s in the right place, uhm, because in August of 1865, a man named George Johnston is elected to the Jefferson County Circuit Court. Johnston’s described in an account as an ardent well-wisher of the Confederates. And as Circuit Judge of the Jefferson County Court, uhm, he files multiple indictments against Palmer for his role in having helped fugitive enslaved peoples escape.

          Uhm, and so for me to see, August of 1865, the prosecution of that crime, and that it was still considered a crime, and that, in fact, it might have been one of Johnston’s key campaign points, to me said, we really…. Said to me the necessity of helping explain Kentucky’s path to emancipation.

          Steve Phan: And to add a li… more context to our listens here, even after Appomattox, the army was still enlisting men in Kentucky, especially at Camp Nelson. 119th and 124th U.S. Colored Infantries were being recruited into May and even early June of 1865. And it was because slavery was still legal, and the best avenue for enli… emancipation for soldiers and their families was military service.

          Cameron Sauers: There is, oh, Steve, to…

          Steve Phan Please add!

          35:09 Cameron Sauers: Sorry to interrupt… a wonderful account from a man named William Jones, who is enslaved in Scott County, who explicitly states that he, uhm, his decision to enlist was because of the federal government’s March declaration, uhm, that the wives and children of men serving in the U.S. military would be free. And so that to me was significant, uhm….

          Steve Phan: And Cameron, the language tells us exactly what this resolution was. And let me read it again to viewers. This is the official title, “ The March 3rd, 1865, Rev… Resolution to Encourage Enlistments and to Promote the Efficiency of the Military Forces of the United States.” And, I don’t believe that it’s too ironic that in the coming weeks and months, recruiters and officers are like, “Wow, more and more are enlisting.” I wonder why? Because they could take care of their families who are now being freed themselves. I think the tragic, in many ways, you mentioned, I’m talking about this tragedy of, uh, slavery may be over by 1865, the end of 1865, even though we know Kentucky doesn’t ratify the 13th Amendment until 1976, uh, but you share, uh, specific cases of racial violence directed at African Americans from the Klan members, these white terror groups, former Confederates, uh, talk more about that, Cameron.

          Cameron Sauer: Yeah, so I think a place to start is actually from, uhm, an individual responsible for a lot of recruitment, James Sanks Brisbin, uhm…

          Steve Phan: Formerly commander of the 5th U.S. Colored Cavalry.

          Cameron Sauers: …who, on April 14, 1865, of all days, wrote to Governor Bramlette, saying that slavery is at an end and rather than deny it or withhold the proper legislation, Kentucky needs to start considering what this… what it would look like during Reconstruction. Uhm, he says, “Brisbin is clear, it is the intention and policy of this government to make every black person in it free”, and, he says, “the sooner Kentucky makes up her mind to accept the new order of things, the better it will be for her.”

          This is a really dramatic thing, except in 1865, in that summer, a gathering of free people… gather and they write and protest that things have… that any promise of freedom seems very dim at this moment. Uhm, a group of men wrote to President Andrew Johnson in June of 1865 that, calling the attention, the letter starts, “We would call your attention to the fact that Kentucky is the only spot within the bounds of these United States where the people of color have no rights, either in law or in fact. And were it not the strong arm of military power no longer to curb her (meaning Kentucky’s laws), the jails and workhouses would groan with the numbers of our people within their walls.”

          And they ask President Johnson to make sure that martial law, military law, which is how the federal government has to intervene in Kentucky, he says, The men asked President Johnson to let them know if he’s going to revoke it, so that they have time to, quote, “fly to other states where law and Christian sentiment will protect us and our little ones from violence and wrong.” And it might seem like that’s just a rhetorical tool, to talk about violence and wrong. But there is, in fact, a heavy amount of violence that’s happening.

          In 1871, in Frankfort, a convention of freed people, uhm, gather and protest and write and record a number of incidents, over 100, they describe fit a pattern of, quote, “organized bands of desperate and lawless men, composed of soldiers of the late Rebel armies committing acts of violence.” And, I think the number is in the 130s. And this convention records that and documents their struggle for justice, which is difficult because in the years after the war, Kentuckians, now free in December of 1865, the 13th Amendment is ratified to become national law, but there still had not been a revision of Kentucky’s legal codes.

          And so, uhm, people of color were prevented from testifying against white persons in court, from using public facilities, or lacking the right to vote, you know, which goes along with the right to have taxation and representation, and they’re very clear about these are the policies that should be changed. But it just shows that what’s been explained is the legal disability of slavery, uhm, in the words of a wonderful book recently by Giuliana Perrone, uhm, does not immediately disappear after the Civil War. It’s a process that takes years and explains the continued actions of reformers and congressional Republicans to enact that law, but they find in Kentuckians strong resistance in many places.

          40:12 Steve Phan: And I think it’s incredibly important that you mention African Americans in Kentucky in 1865, the summer of ‘65, were like, “We need military protection or this is not gonna work out for us.” And, I think, it’s important as well, Cameron, let’s talk about this, kind of, you know, kind of tie the bow at the end. Emancipation is not the same thing as equality.

          Cameron Sauers: Absolutely.

          Steve Phan: So let’s talk about, as you mentioned, the apparatus of slavery may have been, I guess, broken down legally in December of 1865, but not the mindset of many Kentuckians and the culture. And then, you mention Black Codes as well, right? This is ongoing. So let’s… let’s talk about that real quick.

          Cameron Sauers: Yeah, there is, right,… to think about… there is emancipation, there is abolition, there is the legal abolition, which is more specifically about laws, and it takes years, and in some cases does not happen. I note that a recent book by Dylan Penningroth has demonstrated that in contract law textbooks still used by law students here, are cases central to the history of slavery but do not mention to these students studying contract law that they’re about slavery. That slavery became so enmeshed within the American legal system that it was impossible to fully extricate them from each other. And that is a really remarkable moment, that this is a scholar writing in the 2020s who recognizes the long history. But alongside that, right, is the recognition that, uhm, people of color here in Kentucky–enslaved, formerly enslaved, freed– continue to advocate for change and make demands upon the government for reform. And I think their struggle, right, to return to the famous words of Abraham Lincoln, about a government half slave and half freed, Kentuckians were intensely divided about that issue throughout the Civil War and well into the years of Reconstruction.

          Steve Phan: And it impacts the memory of the Civil War in Kentucky.

          Cameron Sauers: Absolutely.

          Steve Phan: So let’s end it with that, Cameron. Let’s talk about this Confederate memory that was adopted, I believe if you…, and I believe professor Anne Marshall really argues this provocatively, it happens during the Civil War and it really happens with Black enlistment and the beginning of the end of the institution of slavery.

          Cameron Sauers: Absolutely. Kentuckians, uhm… and this is Kentuckians in Dr. Marshall’s book, is a wonderful study of how that happens. That the war becomes such a divisive and, for some Kentuckians, alienating experience that they ultimately find more to resonate with them in the memory of the Civil War that’s crafted by former Confederates. These are… some of these individuals here in Kentucky might have been staunch Unionists during the war, but as you note, uhm, they feel alienated from the government because the promise of pro-slavery Unionism, that the conditional Unionism as you describe it–for our loyalty to the Union, we are allowed to maintain the system of slavery– is undone. And they don’t feel like the government held up its side of the bargain. And so it alienates them. It creates this memory of Confederate Kentucky. Even though there is also a history, which I think deserves commemoration and is commemorated here at Camp Nelson, of people seeking freedom and liberation at sites like Camp Nelson but across the state, uhm, looking for a different narrative of memory and one that I think offers us much to consider.

          Steve Phan: Thank you, Cameron, and I think your presentation was one of the most well researched. And I think, for our listeners, listening to the podcast of course, to the people that attended the program, to our staff that attended the program, we talk a lot about the process of emancipation here at Camp Nelson. And we haven’t talked too much about the legal aspect of the state laws that you did so provocatively today, and that’s what I think shows you how, when we talk about the “institution,” this is what institution means. It is literally woven in every aspect of life and culture, but also law and governance as well.

          And I appreciate your time, Cameron. Any final thoughts, uhm, about your presentation or the work you’re going to be doing moving forward?

          Cameron Sauers: I think what this presentation helped me understand, in putting this together and getting to engage with the staff here at Camp Nelson and the visitors to the park today who were treated to two wonderful talks–or a wonderful talk and then mine…

          Steve Phan: Yeah, yours was alright… haha

          Cameron Sauers: … that we have so much yet we can learn about Kentuckians. We might know when legislation is passed and when acts happen, but there is still so much to always learn about how ordinary people experience this great trial in American history, the Trial by Fire in the title of the Eric Foner book. And I think, for me, in writing this, it reflected the privilege and the responsibilities to be able to share and relate these histories in a way that I hope was engaging and compelling to listeners to this podcast and to visitors, to show that we are all part of the making and remaking of memory, of history, and of law. And visitors to Camp Nelson and the site here are supposed to offer us much to consider for our own times and how we understand the past.

          Steve Phan: Thank you, Cameron, I appreciate it. My final takeaway for all of our listeners is: I hope by listening to this presentation and, hopefully, visiting the park, hearing other of our subject matter experts who grace us with their presence here, is I want you to, if possible, consider the process of emancipation, your definition of slavery and freedom during the Civil War. What does freedom mean? What does this process of emancipation look like? And as Cameron demonstrated or shared with us, it’s incredibly complicated. It’s legal, it’s social, it’s cultural, it’s military, it’s literally everything in between.

          I think it’s appropriate to end with a U.S.C.T soldier themselves…

          Cameron Sauers: Mhmm

          Steve Phan: … and, for those that send me an email and I reply, this is in my signature. And this is from Sergeant H. J. Maxwell of Battery A, 2nd U.S. Colored Light Artillery, and think about the date here, right, Cameron, August 7 through 10 in 1865, there was proceedings of the state convention of colored men of the state of Tennessee. And you mentioned some of these conventions that was being organized by African Americans at the end of the Civil War. And according to Sergeant Maxwell, there were many black Kentuckians that left the state and joined units all over the country, including Tennessee, what does freedom mean to him? What does freedom mean for a lot of U.S.C.T. soldiers? What does military service mean? And this is what he said in this… at this convention, “We want two more boxes besides the cartridge box. The ballot box and the jury box. We shall gain them. The government of this nation will not prove false to its plighted faith. It proclaimed freedom and we shall have that in fact.” And for Sergeant Maxwell and his comrades and so many others, military service and freedom meant the rights of citizenship… the rights of citizenship.

          So, again, I want to thank my friend Cameron who is working on his PhD right now at Pennsylvania State University and has been a long time friend and colleague. And I believe that is a very appropriate and powerful conclusion to the first episode of the park podcast, “Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era,” at Camp Nelson National Monument. I want to thank my friend, Cameron Sauers, for joining us. And there’s going to be many more episodes coming up as well, from other Winter Lecture Series presenters, but also stories that you’ll hear from park staff as well. And it’s going to be very exciting. I want to thank our producer, our sound person, our director, Grayson Briggs, who made this possible. She’s the one who really spurred the development of, Echoes of Camp Nelson: Uncovering the Stories of the Civil War Era, here at Camp Nelson National Monument. Please go to our website at www.nps.gov/cane and you can hear more, you can see our calendar of events, including the 160th Anniversary special events that are coming this year. Thank you for joining us and cheers to another year of Monumental Moments at Camp Nelson National Monument. Goodbye.

          In this debut episode of the Echoes of Camp Nelson Podcast, Ranger Steve speaks with Cameron Sauers about slavery, emancipation, and the legal culture of Civil War Kentucky.