Last updated: March 19, 2025
Article
Climate and Water Monitoring at Amistad National Recreation Area: Water Year 2022

NPS
Overview
Together, climate and hydrology shape ecosystems and the services they provide, particularly in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Understanding changes in climate, groundwater, and surface water is key to assessing the condition of park natural resources—and often, cultural resources.
At Amistad National Recreation Area (Figure 1), Chihuahuan Desert Inventory and Monitoring Network scientists study how ecosystems may be changing by taking measurements of key resources, or “vital signs,” year after year—much as a doctor keeps track of a patient’s vital signs. This long-term ecological monitoring provides early warning of potential problems, allowing managers to mitigate them before they become worse. At Amistad National Recreation Area, we monitor climate and groundwater, reservoir level, and springs, among other vital signs.
Surface-water and groundwater conditions are closely related to climate conditions. Because they are better understood together, we report on climate in conjunction with water resources. Reporting is by water year (WY), which begins in October of the previous calendar year and goes through September of the water year (e.g., WY2022 runs from October 2021 through September 2022). This article reports the results of climate and water monitoring at Amistad National Recreation Area (Figure 1) in WY2022

NPS
Climate and Weather
There is often confusion over the terms “weather” and “climate.” In short, weather describes instantaneous meteorological conditions (e.g., it’s currently raining or snowing, it’s a hot or frigid day). Climate reflects patterns of weather at a given place over longer periods of time (seasons to years). Climate is the primary driver of ecological processes on earth. Climate and weather information provide context for understanding the status or condition of other park resources.
Methods
A National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Cooperative Observer Program (NOAA COOP) weather station (Amistad Dam #410225) has been operational at Amistad National Recreation Area since 1964 (Figure 1). This station provides a reliable, long-term climate dataset used for analyses in this climate and water report. Data from this station are accessible through Climate Analyzer.

NPS
Results for Water Year 2022
Precipitation
Annual precipitation at Amistad Dam in WY2022 was 11.82″ (30.0 cm; Figure 2), 7.61″ (19.3 cm) less than the 1991–2020 annual average. This deficit resulted from no or substantially less than average rainfall in six different months (November, January, February, March, June, and July). However, April and August received 43–46% more rainfall than the 1991–2020 monthly averages, 0.54″ (1.4 cm) and 1.16″ (2.9 cm) more, respectively. Extreme daily rainfall events (≥ 1″; 2.54 cm) occurred on 4 days, one less than the 1991–2020 average annual frequency of 5.1 days. Extreme rainfall events occurred on 01 October 2021 (1.22″; 3.1 cm), 02 May 2022 (1.13″; 2.9 cm), 16 August 2022 (1.20″; 3.0 cm), and 30 August 2022 (1.14″; 2.9 cm).
Air Temperature
The mean annual maximum temperature at Amistad Dam in WY2022 was 84.3°F (29.1°C), 3.3°F (1.8°C) above the 1991–2020 average. The mean annual minimum temperature in WY2022 was 59.7°F (15.4°C), 1.7°F (0.9°C) above the 1991–2020 average. Mean monthly maximum and minimum temperatures in WY2022 were generally warmer than average or near average for most of the year and differed by as much as 10.3°F (5.7°C; see December as an example) relative to the 1991–2020 monthly averages (Figure 2). However, cooler than average temperatures were observed in January, February, and March. Extremely hot temperatures (≥ 102°F; 38.9°C) occurred on 39 days in WY2022, nearly twice the 1991–2020 average frequency of 21.5 days. Extremely cold temperatures (≤ 35°F; 1.7°C) occurred on 30 days, 50% more than the average frequency of 20.1 days.

NPS
Drought
Reconnaissance drought index (Tsakiris and Vangelis 2005) provides a measure of drought severity and extent relative to the long-term climate. It is based on the ratio of average precipitation to average potential evapotranspiration (the amount of water loss that would occur from evaporation and plant transpiration if the water supply was unlimited) over short periods of time (seasons to years). The reconnaissance drought index for Amistad National Recreation Area indicates that WY2022 was drier than the 1991–2022 average from the perspective of both precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (Figure 3).
Reference: Tsakiris G., and H. Vangelis. 2005. Establishing a drought index incorporating evapotranspiration. European Water 9: 3–11.

NPS

NPS
Reservoir Level
The Amistad International Reservoir was formed by the construction of Amistad Dam between 1964 and 1969. Reservoir level is not a Chihuahuan Desert Network vital sign; however, it is included in this report because the reservoir level has implications for park resources throughout Amistad National Recreation Area, including groundwater and springs.
Methods
The International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) has operated a water level gage at Amistad Reservoir (International Amistad Reservoir Storage Station Number 08-4508.00) since 1968 when filling began. The gage is located at the downstream end of the reservoir. Every 15 minutes, the gage collects water level data, which are available from the IBWC and the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB).
Recent Findings
Mean reservoir level in WY2022 was 1,064.75 feet above mean sea level (ft amsl; 324.53 m amsl) with a range of 1,052.47 to 1,075.18 ft amsl (320.79–327.71 m amsl; Figure 4). For the entire year, reservoir level remained below the flood pool elevation (1,140.4 ft, 347.59 m; elevation of flood gates and emergency spillway) and the conservation pool elevation (1,117.0 ft, 340.46 m; maximum normal operating level, above which the storage is used to regulate floodwaters). Throughout the year, the reservoir ranged from 30–52% full. Daily reservoir water level in WY2022 was on average 52.25 ft (15.93 m) below the conservation pool and 27.89 ft (8.50 m) below the mean water level for 1991–2020. Reservoir level dropped below the 1991–2020 minimum during two periods: 5 April to 19 April 2022 and 27 June to 01 September 2022.

NPS
Groundwater
Groundwater is one of the most critical natural resources of the American Southwest, providing drinking water, irrigating crops, and sustaining rivers, streams, and springs throughout the region.
Methods
Amistad National Recreation Area groundwater is monitored using six wells in or near the recreation area (Figure 1). Each well is monitored annually by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) and the data are available at the TWDB Database.
Results of Water Year 2022
Well 7140201 could not be measured, possibly due to a well collapse. Groundwater levels in the remaining five monitored wells decreased between WY2020 and WY2022 (Table 1 and Figure 5); groundwater at the park was not monitored by TWDB in WY2021 due to Covid-19 disruptions to fieldwork). These decreases were consistent with a 16.35 ft (4.98 m) decrease in reservoir level when groundwater was sampled in WY2022 compared to WY2020. Groundwater levels in wells 7033302 and 7140307 are on the periphery of the reservoir and were 4.85 ft (1.48 m) and 10.08 ft (3.07 m) below the level of the reservoir, respectively. The water level in 7033508 was 161.35 ft (49.18 m), the lowest recorded water level since monitoring began in 2000 and 55.23 ft (16.83 m) below the reservoir water level. The well was not pumping during the measurement, but TWDB noted that nearby pumping may be causing this low water level. Water levels in wells 7017403 and 7122403 were both substantially higher than the reservoir level because they are up gradient of the reservoir, adjacent to the Devils River and the Pecos River, respectively.
State Well Number | Location | Wellhead Elevation | Depth to Water | Water Level Elevation | Change in Elevation from WY2020 | Elevation Difference from Amistad Reservoir Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7017403 | 15.6 mi NE of dam on Devil's River | 1180 | 62.58 | 1117.42 | −0.42 | +48.51 |
7033302 | 9.2 mi ENE of dam | 1215 | 150.97 | 1064.03 | −15.43 | −4.85 |
7033508 | 6.7 mi E of dam | 1175 | 161.35 | 1013.65 | −33.28 | −55.23 |
7122403 | 25.3 mi NW of dam on Pecos River | 1312 | 163.07 | 1148.93 | −0.47 | +80.05 |
7140201 | 3.2 mi NNE of dam | 1167 | NA1 | NA1 | NA1 | NA1 |
7140307 | 2.0 mi NE of dam | 1162 | 103.202 | 1058.802 | −15.652 | −10.082 |
2Well level measurement is flagged as questionable in the TWDB database.

NPS
Springs
Background
Springs, seeps, and tinajas (small pools in a rock basin or impoundments in bedrock) are small, relatively rare biodiversity hotspots in arid lands. They are the primary connection between groundwater and surface water and are important water sources for plants and animals. For springs, the most important questions we ask are about persistence (How long was there water in the spring?) and water quantity (How much water was in the spring?). Springs reporting is by water year (WY), which begins in October of the previous calendar year and goes through September of the current calendar year (e.g., WY2022 runs from October 2021 through September 2022). Springs sampling for WY2022 at Amistad National Recreation Area occurred between 12 April and 14 April 2022, except for water persistence, which is monitored continuously throughout the water year.
Methods
Chihuahuan Desert Network springs monitoring is organized into four modules, described below.
Site Characterization
This module, which includes recording GPS locations and drawing a site diagram, provides context for interpreting change in the other modules. We also describe the spring type (e.g., helocrene, limnocrene, rheocrene, or tinaja) and its associated vegetation in this module. Helocrene springs emerge as low-gradient wetlands, limnocrene springs emerge as pools, and rheocrene springs emerge as flowing streams. This module is completed once every five years or after significant hydrologic events.
Site Condition
We estimate natural and anthropogenic disturbances and the level of stress on vegetation and soils on a scale of 1–4, where 1 = undisturbed, 2 = slightly disturbed, 3 = moderately disturbed, and 4 = highly disturbed. Types of natural disturbances can include flooding, drying, fire, wildlife impacts, windthrow of trees and shrubs, beaver activity, and insect infestations. Anthropogenic disturbances can include roads, off-highway vehicle trails, hiking trails, livestock and feral animal impacts, removal of invasive non-native plants, flow modification, and other evidence of human use of the spring. We take repeat photographs from monumented locations showing the spring and its landscape context. We note the presence of certain obligate wetland plants (plants that almost always occur only in wetlands), facultative wetland plants (plants that usually occur in wetlands, but also occur in other habitats), and the non-native American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) and crayfish, and we record the density of invasive, non-native plants.
Water Quantity
We measure the persistence of surface water, amount of spring discharge, and wetted extent (area that contained water). To estimate persistence, we analyze the variance of temperature measurements taken by logging thermometers placed at or near the orifice (spring opening). Because water mediates variation in diurnal temperatures, data from a submerged sensor will show less daily variation than data from an exposed, open-air sensor; this tells us when the spring was wet or dry. Surface discharge is measured with a timed sample of water volume. Wetted extent is a systematic measurement of the physical length (up to 100 m), width, and depth of surface water. It is assessed using a technique for either standing water (e.g., limnocrene and helocrene springs) or flowing water (e.g., rheocrene springs).
Water Quality
We measure core water quality and water chemistry parameters. Core parameters include water temperature, pH, specific conductivity (a measure of dissolved compounds and contaminants), dissolved oxygen (how much oxygen is present in the water), and total dissolved solids (an indicator of potentially undesirable compounds). Discrete samples of these parameters are collected with a multiparameter meter. If the meter fails calibration checks, we do not present the data. Water chemistry is assessed by collecting surface water samples and estimating the concentration of major ions with a photometer in the field. These parameters are collected at one or more sampling locations within a spring. Data are presented only for the primary sampling location within each spring. Each perennial spring is somewhat unique, and Texas has not adopted water quality standards that would apply across the diversity of springs described here. Ongoing data collection at each spring will improve our understanding of the natural range in water quality and water chemistry parameters for a given site.
List of Springs
Scroll down or click on a spring below to view monitoring results.

NPS
WY2022 Findings at Dead Man's Canyon Spring
Dead Man’s Canyon Spring (Figure 6 above) is a hanging garden spring (a complex, multi-habitat spring that emerges along geologic contacts and seeps onto underlying walls) located in Dead Man’s Canyon, a side canyon flowing into the Pecos River. Here, water seeps from along a cliff face and drips down onto underlying walls, supporting a robust community of wetland plants clinging to the rock, and small, shallow pools are hidden behind the vegetation. Flow from the hanging garden joins flow from two other orifices inside the canyon bottom. The WY2022 visit occurred on 13 April 2022, and Dead Man’s Canyon Spring was wetted (contained water).
Site Condition
In WY2022, Dead Man’s Canyon Spring was slightly disturbed from grazing by aoudad, or Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia), an introduced invasive bovine from North Africa. We ranked the spring as slightly disturbed from native wildlife (digging, scat, and browse), higher than in previous years. WY2022 was the first time that the spring was rated slightly disturbed from drying, with the overall spring ecosystem noticeably drier and reduced in extent as compared to past years. No other natural or human-caused disturbances were observed at Dead Man’s Canyon Spring in WY2022.
We did not find American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus), a non-native, invasive animal. As in most past years, we detected a pair of invasive plants: scattered patches of the wetland obligate giant reed (Arundo donax) and a few (≤ 5) tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) plants. We observed cattail (Typhaceae sp.) and maidenhair fern (Adiantum sp.), obligate wetland plants that have been consistently observed at Dead Man’s Canyon Spring since monitoring started in 2017. In WY2022, we detected sedge (Carex sp.) for the first time.
Water Quantity
We were unable to sample the site or replace sensors in WY2021, so the temperature sensors (used to estimate spring persistence) lost power well before our WY2022 visit, resulting in considerable missing data (Figure 7). In prior water years, the spring was wetted 99.7–100% of the days measured.

NPS
Discharge was estimated at 1.3 (± 0.2) L/min (0.3 ± 0.1 gal/min) in WY2022—only 10–20% of the flow observed in past years (Table 2). Conversely, wetted extent was greater, particularly springbrook length, which was five times longer than the previous longest observation (Table 3).
We attribute this somewhat strange combination—dramatically lower discharge coupled with a much larger wetted extent—to changes in the water levels in the adjacent Amistad Reservoir. The reservoir level was lower than measured in previous years, such that the springbrook had a longer distance to travel to reach the reservoir. And reduced reservoir levels likely reduced the hydraulic head of groundwater supporting the spring, leading to reduced discharge and the drying disturbance noted for the first time in WY2022.
Water Quality
Core water quality (Table 4) and water chemistry (Table 5) data were collected at the primary sampling location. Dissolved oxygen was within range of prior values, while specific conductivity and total dissolved solids were slightly higher, and pH and water temperature were lower. Alkalinity, magnesium, and sulphate were within range of prior values, while calcium was slightly lower, and chloride and potassium were higher. The values are presented in the tables below along with ranges of prior values (2017–2019).
Dead Man's Canyon Spring Data Tables
Sampling Location | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) | Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|
007 | 1.3 ± 0.2 (6.7–14.0) | 2017–2019 (3) |
Measurement | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|
Width (cm) | 85.8 ± 90.8 (92.9–93.0) | 2018–2019 (2) |
Depth (cm) | 8.3 ± 9.4 (5.2–5.8) | 2018–2019 (2) |
Length (m) | 31.8 (6.7–7.0) | 2018–2019 (2) |
Sampling Location | Measurement Location (width, depth) |
Parameter | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|---|---|
001 | Center | Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | 5.80 (5.59–12.02) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | pH | 7.84 (8.01–8.18) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Specific conductivity (µS/cm) | 450.8 (424.6–442.3) |
2018–2019 (2) |
001 | Center | Temperature (°C) | 20.3 (21.3–22.3) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Total dissolved solids (mg/L) | 293.0 (271.0–287.3) |
2017–2019 (3) |
Sampling Location | Measurement Location (width, depth) |
Parameter | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|---|---|
001 | Center | Alkalinity (CaCO3) |
185 (180–190) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Calcium (Ca) |
56 (58–70) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Chloride (Cl) |
20 (13–14) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Magnesium (Mg) |
16 (12–96) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Potassium (K) |
2.0 (0.8–1.7) |
2017–2019 (3) |
001 | Center | Sulphate (SO4) |
3 (3–8) |
2017–2019 (3) |

NPS
WY2022 Findings at Indian Springs Canyon Spring
Indian Springs Canyon Spring (Figure 8 above) is a rheocrene spring (a spring that emerges into one or more stream channels) in Indian Springs Canyon. The spring has a strong hydrologic connectivity to the water level of Lake Amistad. As a result, the location of the primary emergence for this spring fluctuates considerably. The spring can emerge 500 m up the canyon (at Orifice A, as it did in WY2018–WY2020), the mouth of the canyon (at Orifice G, as it did in WY2022), or one or more of the secondary orifices in between. Spring characteristics vary depending on emergence location, but due to the low gradient of the canyon, the spring typically forms standing, elongated pools or a slowly flowing stream over cobble and bedrock. The WY2022 visit occurred on 14 April 2022, and the spring was wetted (contained water) at the mouth of the canyon.
Site Condition
We rated Indian Springs Canyon Spring moderately disturbed from drying, likely reflecting the impacts of relatively low reservoir levels observed in WY2022. As in past years, we also rated the spring slightly disturbed from contemporary human use (trash within the site). The spring was slightly disturbed from livestock, consistent with our past sampling (WY2017–2021). No other natural or human-caused disturbances were observed at Indian Springs Canyon Spring in WY2022.
We did not observe American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus), a non-native, invasive aquatic animal, but did detect a dense matrix of the invasive, exotic bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon; Figure 9) around the upper springbrook of Indian Springs Canyon Spring. Although bermudagrass had been detected previously in WY2018, it was limited to just a few plants. Scattered patches of tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) were also detected for the first time at this spring in WY2022. As in past years, a few lilac chastetrees (Vitex agnus-castus) were observed around the springbrook. No native obligate wetland species were observed at the spring.

NPS
Water Quantity
The dynamic nature of spring emergence at Indian Springs Canyon Spring makes monitoring persistence throughout the year challenging. A temperature sensor has been deployed at Orifice A since WY2018. This sensor indicated that the spring was wetted (contained water) at that location for 7 of 196 days (3.6%) measured in WY2022 up to our visit on 14 April 2022 (Figure 10). During this visit, the spring was wetted near the mouth of the canyon but not at Orifice A. In prior water years, the spring was wetted at Orifice A 3.8–86.7% of the days measured.

NPS
Discharge was not estimated at the primary sampling location in WY2022 due to a lack of surface flow. Discharge data for WY2018 (estimated at 85.8 ± 6.6 L/min [22.6 ± 1.7 gal/min]) are presented in (Table 6).
Wetted extent (Table 7) was evaluated using a method for flowing water. The total brook length was 67.6 m (221.8 ft). Width and depth averaged 4.5 m (14.8 ft), and 18.2 cm (7.2 in), respectively. Overall, wetted extent was on the high end or exceeded the range of previous wetted extent measurements despite the dry nature of the overall site.
Water Quality
Core water quality and water chemistry data were taken where the spring was flowing (Orifice G, sampling location 007), close to the mouth of the canyon. In prior years, water chemistry and water quality data were measured at Orifice A (sampling location 001). Values from 2022 and prior years are presented in Table 8 and Table 9. Additional measurements at each sampling location will provide necessary context for the water quality at the site.
Indian Springs Canyon Spring Data Tables
Sampling Location (sampling location in prior years) |
WY2022 Value (prior value) | Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|
007 (001) | c.n.s. (85.8) | 2018 (1) |
Measurement | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|
Width (m) | 4.50 ± 2.66 (1.79–2.93) | 2017–2019 (3) |
Depth (cm) | 18.2 ± 20.4 (3.5–13.7) | 2017–2019 (3) |
Length (m) | 67.6 (27.0–100.0) | 2017–2019 (3) |
Sampling Location (sampling location in prior years) | Measurement Location (width, depth) |
Parameter | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|---|---|
007 (001) | Center | Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) | 6.32 (6.97–7.49) |
2018–2019 (2) |
007 (001) | Center | pH | 7.37 (7.40–7.64) |
2017–2019 (6) |
007 (001) | Center | Specific conductivity (µS/cm) | 395.2 (390.6–397.4) |
2018–2019 (2) |
007 (001) | Center | Temperature (°C) | 23.5 (23.0–23.5) |
2017–2019 (7) |
007 (001) | Center | Total dissolved solids (mg/L) | 257.0 (254.2–259.4) |
2017–2019 (5) |
Sampling Location | Measurement Location (width, depth) |
Parameter | WY2022 Value (range of prior values) |
Prior Years Measured (# of measurements) |
---|---|---|---|---|
007 (001) | Center | Alkalinity (CaCO3) |
150 (165–180) |
2017–2019 (3) |
007 (001) | Center | Calcium (Ca) |
54 (52–58) |
2017–2019 (3) |
007 (001) | Center | Chloride (Cl) |
5 (8) |
2017–2019 (3) |
007 (001) | Center | Magnesium (Mg) |
11 (10–13) |
2017–2019 (3) |
007 (001) | Center | Potassium (K) |
0.4 (0.1–0.9) |
2017–2019 (3) |
007 (001) | Center | Sulphate (SO4) |
0 (2–4) |
2017–2019 (3) |
Report Citation
Authors: Susan Singley, Kara Raymond, Andy Hubbard
Singley, S., K. Raymond, and A. Hubbard. 2024. Climate and Water Monitoring at Amistad National Recreation Area: Water Year 2022. Chihuahuan Desert Network, National Park Service, Las Cruces, New Mexico.