Indigenous cultural landscapes demonstrate aspects of the natural and cultural resources that supported American Indian lifeways and settlements in the early 17th century. Considered trail-related resources to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, these evocative places may be important to descendant communities today as well as to conservation strategies in the Chesapeake watershed. Ongoing research is helping to define and identify these large landscapes.
This concept grew from attempts to explain an indigenous perspective of large landscapes in the Chesapeake region in response to the Chesapeake Bay Executive Order of 2009.This perspective demonstrates that American Indian places were not confined to the sites of houses, towns, or settlements, and that the American Indian view of one's homeland is holistic rather than compartmentalized into the discrete site elements typically used in our language today, such as "hunting grounds", "villages", or "sacred sites".
Read the paper that was used in the 2010 comprehensive management plan for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, which includes the criteria posited by the initial advisory team. You can also view a rack card developed for distribution at conferences.
The paper Examples of ICLs in Virginia, originally authored in 2011, describes examples of indigenous cultural landscapes along proposed segments of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail in Virginia;it was updated in 2015. Each example includes lists of which criteria apply and how the sites can be interpreted as indigenous cultural landscapes.
ICL research began in 2012, and by 2013 a team from the University of Maryland had completed a prototype methodology summary with recommendations for further research, and a pilot study of the Nanticoke River watershed using this prototype methodology.
Building on that methodology for documenting ICLs, researchers from St. Mary's College of Maryland completed a study of the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek watersheds in November 2015. This study added the dimension of predictive modelling, which was field tested with excellent results.
Using similar predictive modelling on a larger scale, the same team of researchers also completed an ICL priorities report for the tidal Chesapeake Bay watershed in February 2016. This report was commissioned to help the National Park Service prioritize ICL research areas over the coming years.
Studies of the Lower Susquehanna River in 2014-2015 tested the ICL concept in a landscape that has been greatly altered by industry, especially dams which affected the aquatic and shoreline ecosystems. The area also lacks a strong association with a particular nearby descendant community, although nations of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy in upstate New York recognize the Susquehannock who later left the area as their ancestors. An initial study (Contact Period Landscapes of the Lower Susquehanna) focused on gathering archaeological data and information from subject matter experts to identify high-probability areas for habitation. A further study (ICL study of CAJO NHT: The Lower Susquehanna Area) by Bucknell University provided a narrative of probable American Indian habitation with a bibliography. In 2016 the NPS produced a framing narrative with recommendations for further ICL research and application.
In December 2016, the St. Mary’s College of Maryland research team delivered their report Defining the Rappahannock Indigenous Cultural Landscape. The project team mapped 552 square miles of the middle Rappahannock River basin between Port Royal and Totuskey Creek in Virginia, the aboriginal territory of the Rappahannock Indians. Members of the Rappahannock Indian Tribe contributed significantly to the project and the report’s recommendations. Data analysis and consultation with the tribal community led to important reconsiderations of previous scholarly research.
The NPS envisions indigenous cultural landscape research being informative and useful in multiple ways, including for future National Register of Historic Places eligibility determinations of historic districts that are part of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail.
Indigenous Cultural Landscapes (ICLs) are evocative of the natural and cultural resources supporting American Indian lifeways and settlement patterns in the early 17th century. Important to descendant communities today, and to conservation strategies in the Chesapeake, this approach to understanding large landscapes is in ongoing research.
These landscapes comprise the cultural and natural resources that would have supported the historic lifestyles and settlement patterns of an Indian group in its totality. The concept attempts to demonstrate that American Indian places were not confined to the sites of houses, towns, or settlements, and that the American Indian view of one's homeland is holistic rather than compartmentalized into the discrete site elements typically used in our language today such as "hunting grounds", "villages", or "sacred sites".
An Introduction to the Indigenous Cultural Landscape Concept Overview
The concept of the Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL), first introduced in the Comprehensive Management Plan for the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, is intended to represent large landscapesfrom the perspective of American Indian nations at the time of their first contact with Europeans. These landscapes comprise the cultural and natural resourcesthat would have supported the historic lifestyles and settlement patterns of an Indian group in their totality. The concept attemptsto demonstrate that American Indian places were not confined to the sites of houses, towns, or settlements, and that the American Indian view of one’s homeland is holistic rather than organized into “natural” and “cultural” features, or divided into discrete site elements such as “hunting grounds,” “villages,” or “sacred sites.” Indigenous Cultural Landscapes are one of seven trail-related resource types along the John Smith Trail. Visitor experiences of the trail’s major themes – John Smith’s voyages, American Indian cultures of the 17th century and today, and the Chesapeake environment of then and now – depend on the continued presence of key resources along the trail, including landscapes evocative of the early 17 th century. To further define, study, and test the concept of Indigenous Cultural Landscapes, American Indian tribal members, state historic preservation and natural resource officials, archaeologists, and NPS staff have convened since 2010 to articulate criteria, identify landscapes, and conduct regional and national outreach. An ICL resource group comprised of NPS staff, tribal members and researchers has informed and helped refine the concept, and is fostering applications beyond the Chesapeake region.
Major eventsin the timeline of the development of the Indigenous Cultural Landscape have included the following:
2010 Introduction of the concept in the Comprehensive Management Plan of the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, and formation of the ICL resource group.
2012-14 The University of Maryland created an annotated bibliography, refined the criteria and developed a prototype methodology for identifying ICLs. The methodology was applied through an initial study of the Nanticoke River in Maryland and Delaware. The bibliography and prototype are posted online at http://www.nps.gov/chba/parknews/indigenous-cultural-landscapes.htm.
2013-15 ICL identification and mapping, and a bibliography and narrative completed for the Lower Susquehanna River watershed, with extensive expert and scholarly input, including the assistance of Bucknell University.
2015 St. Mary’s College of Maryland is conducting an ICL study for the Nanjemoy peninsula along the Potomac. Environmental, historical, and cultural resource information about the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman watersheds are being described and mapped in collaboration with members of state-recognized Piscataway groups and other stakeholders. The report will reflect an evolution of the initial prototype methodology.
2015-16 St. Mary’s College of Maryland and the Chesapeake Conservancy, working with the NPS are modeling potential predictive areas for identifying ICLS along the John Smith Trail using current archaeological and topological data to identify known and potential hot-spots for conducting further consultation, surveying, and research.
2015-17 With guidance from the ICL resource team, the SHPOs, American Indian tribes and other stakeholders, a definition or variance of the ICL concept will be considered relative to the National Register of Historic Places. This is occurring in conjunction with NPS-led efforts to engage the State Historic Preservation offices and interested parties in development of a multiple property nomination for the John Smith Trail. The ICL concept has broad conservation and interpretation applications beyond its characterization as a trail-related cultural resource.
To conceptualize ICLs in the Chesapeake, it is helpful to understand the historical and landscape features which must or may be present, as follows:
Core landscape criteria include:
• Good agricultural soil (fine sandy loam, 1-2% grade)
• Fresh water source (because river or creek water may be brackish)
• Transportation tributary adjacent
• Landing place (confluence of tributaries optimal)
• Marshes nearby (for waterfowl, shellfish, reeds, tubes, muskrat, turtles)
• Brush areas (for small game, berries)
• Primary or mixed deciduous forest (can be restored or restorable, for larger game, nuts, bark, firewood)
• Uplands that could support hunting activities (are supporting a variety of wildlife) • Proximity to known American Indian community (documented through ethnohistory or archaeology; may be Contact-era or later)
• Trails used as footpaths (usually became Colonial roads; sometimes are today’s highways and local roads).
Additional desirable attributes either coincide with the above criteria or enhance an initial ICL assessment:
• Protection from wind (when applicable)
• High terrace landform (when applicable)
• Areas of recurrent use for food or medicine acquisition (shell middens, plant gathering sites)
• Areas of recurrent for tool acquisition (quarries)
• Places with high probability for ceremonial or spiritual use (even if not documented), or known by a descendent community to have been used for ceremony
• Parcels that can be interpreted as supporting activities of Indian community sustainability, such as trading places or meeting places
•Places associated with ancestors, or part of a descendent community’s past known through tribal history, oral history, or archaeology.
Additional watersheds will be documented as funding allows, and informed by preliminary modelling of the Chesapeake, where archaeological evidence or information combines with natural features suggestive of a pre-Contact American Indian presence. As awareness of the concept spreads, and mapping provides a finer-grained definition of the criteria, more public agencies and academic partners may adopt the approach as a means to engage American Indians in identifying special places; for conservation purposes; and to enable development of public interpretation (brochures, programs, and exhibits) to help the general public to see the landscape through indigenous eyes.
Additional projects in progress are an ICL priorities report for the tidal Chesapeake Bay watershed, and ICL research on the tidal Rappahannock River. Research reports will be available here when they are final.
Other federal agencies and partner organizations also collaborate on research designed to understand landscape-scale significance and potential impacts on management planning. In November, 2015, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), released "A Guidance Document for Characterizing Tribal Cultural Landscapes". That report was prepared by BOEM and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Makah Tribe, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, Yurok Tribe, and National Marine Sanctuary Foundation.
Last updated: August 16, 2018