Article

Betty Hardison and the American Dream

Article written by Nicole Martin, PhD

Black and white photo of young couple with baby in front of house
Betty, her husband Don, and their son standing in front of their Atchison Village home in 1946.

National Park Service, Rosie the Riveter/WWII Home Front NHP, RORI 3623

In 2009, when Betty Hardison recorded her memories of working at the Richmond shipyards during World War II, she fondly remembered the community that formed in government worker housing. “We remained good friends throughout our lives, with lots of good memories, and watched children being added.”1

Betty’s account is valuable for showing how women’s work on the WWII home front shaped her home life. Betty and her husband Don lived in Atchison Village, a housing complex close to the shipyards open to white upper-level and management workers. This experience played a pivotal role in allowing the Hardisons to achieve the mid-twentieth-century American Dream: owning a single-family, suburban home.2 Betty’s recollections hint at, but do not explicitly state, how her family’s success depended on government support that excluded non-white Americans.

WWII Migration & the Richmond Shipyards

Fueled by federal investment in shipbuilding, the demographic landscape of California’s East Bay changed dramatically during WWII. Thousands of workers took part in a westward exodus seeking defense jobs, including women and African Americans from the South. With 55 war industries, Richmond, California became a “boomtown.” Its population grew from under 24,000 to over 100,000 during the war, with the African American population growing from 270 to 10,000.3

Six million American women entered the workforce during WWII. Many were known as “Rosie the Riveters” for working in non-traditional industrial jobs, although many worked in more traditional occupations, such as administrative support. At the Kaiser Shipyards in Richmond, women composed 27% of the workforce. They helped to build an unprecedented 747 ships during the war.4
Portrait of young African American woman in welder’s helmet.
Shipyard Worker, Richmond, CA, Circa 1943 by Dorothea Lange

Dorothea Lange, Shipyard Worker, ca. 1943 (A67.137.42073.8), gift of Paul S. Taylor. The Dorothea Lange Collection©, Oakland Museum of California.

Betty Hardison met her husband while working for the Navy at Mare Island in Vallejo. After marrying in 1942, they both worked in Richmond’s Shipyard No. 3 as “exempt employees,” which meant they were cleared through the gate with only their identification and not a time card. Betty first worked as a secretary for an engineer in the drafting room before being transferred to clerical duties in the Housing Office. She handled the correspondence and inquiries pertaining to housing applications for the workers of Shipyard No. 3.5

Atchison Village & The Housing Crisis

After marrying, Betty and Don moved into 164 Collins Street, a one-bedroom unit of a four-plex in the new planned government worker housing, Atchison Village. The complex included winding streets, spacious yards, a community center, and a park. Betty describes a life restricted by war: living on tight rations, fixing bag lunches, piecing together inexpensive mismatched furniture, and weekends filled with laundry. However, her overall tone is positive, as she emphasizes the formation of a tight-knit community. When she and Don failed to make a productive victory garden, their neighbors shared their “super garden” with them. They joined a church and a group of young couples called “the Mariners” that, along with close neighbors, met regularly for dinner get-togethers of tuna and chicken casseroles.6
Modest, white clapboard single story homes faced central grassy courtyard in planned neighborhood of government housing. Sing reads “private property no trespassing.”
Atchison Village, Collins Street, Richmond, California

Historic American Engineering Record, Library of Congress

Betty and Don were fortunate to have their own place. The tens of thousands of workers arriving in Richmond severely strained city resources. The lack of housing in the early years meant that workers lived in tents, boats, and cars, and according to Betty, “many even slept in movie theaters.” She also mentions that the need for housing was so great that “spare rooms in private homes were offered.”7 This likely refers to the federal government’s “war guest” program that leased spare rooms from Richmond’s white families to white workers. Black migrants either had to find private homes through their own networks, and if that failed, were forced, due to residential segregation, to live in unincorporated land near the city dump with no running water, electricity, or sanitation.8

By 1943, the federal government had built 21,000 public housing units that housed 60% of Richmond’s population, making it the largest federal housing program in the nation. Barrack-type buildings and single-sex dormitories were the most common type of government housing. Betty noted that many “poor minorities” started coming to Richmond from the deep South in early 1944. What she did not mention was that the well-designed Atchison Village only permitted white workers. In housing projects that did allow African Americans, the Richmond Housing Authority assigned Black residents to separate buildings and forbade any integrated activities.9

The American Dream Realized

After struggling to have children, Betty and Don had their first child in late 1945. Betty concludes her account on a final triumphant note: “[W]e remained in our Atchison Village apartment until 1948, when we purchased our first home.”10 They bought a single-family, suburban home in Richmond, fulfilling the postwar American dream of homeownership. In the Cold War that followed, the home with a nuclear family at its center became the symbol of democratic abundance.11

The dream Betty and her family achieved was supported by federal subsidies that excluded non-white families. By 1950, almost 80% of Richmond’s Black population lived in government funded war housing designated as temporary and slated for demolition. In contrast, all-white developments, such as Atchison, had been conceived of as permanent from the start. At the same time, the federal government approved bank loans for the creation of a new Richmond suburb, Rollingwood, stipulating that none of the 700 homes be sold to African Americans.12 Richmond suburbs reflected the segregation found in federally built, mass-produced white suburbs across the nation after WWII.13

Betty and other middle-class women like her certainly faced challenges as working women during the war. Her account reveals how she persevered, building community along the way. However, her family’s ability to buy a single-family, suburban home at the end of the war was greatly aided by the advantages she experienced because of her race. By contrast, during the war African Americans were faced with racial discrimination and struggled to find places to live or faced the hardship of temporary war housing. Significantly, African Americans continued to experience restrictive racial covenants, policies, and strategies following the war that limited their ability to achieve the American Dream and call Richmond home.

Read Betty Hardison's Full Account



1 Betty Hardison, “Betty Hardison’s Story, World War II, Shipyard 3, Richmond, California,” April 10, 2009, National Park Service, Rosie the Riveter/WWII Home Front NHP, RORI 3623.

2 For more on the mid-century American Dream, see Elaine Tyler May, Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era, 20th Anniversary edition (New York: Basic Books, 2008), especially 153-73.

3 The WWII Home Front,” National Park Service. Gretchen Lemke-Santangelo, Abiding Courage: African American Migrant Women and the East Bay Community (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1996), 50-51.

4 Donna Graves, “Tending the Homefront: The Many Roles of Women in the San Francisco Bay Area During World War II,” National Park Service.

5 Hardison, “Betty Hardison’s Story.”

6 Ibid.

7 Living on the Home Front,” Rosie the Riveter WWII Home Front National Historical Park, National Park Service. Hardison, “Betty Hardison’s Story.”

8 Richard Rothstein, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America (New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2017), 35.. Lemke-Santangelo, Abiding Courage, 81.

9 “Living on the Home Front.” Hardison, “Betty Hardison’s Story.” Lemke-Santangelo, Abiding Courage, 87.

10 Hardison, “Betty Hardison’s Story.” Rothstein, The Color of Law, 35.

11 May, Homeward Bound, 153. For how the U.S. exported the American concept of homeownership as pillars of democracy and capitalism around the world, see Nancy H. Kwak, A World of Homeowners: American Power and the Politics of Housing Aid (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015).

12 Lemke-Santangelo, Abiding Courage, 9. Rothstein, The Color of Law, 36.

13 For further reading on how federal policies segregated U.S. housing, see Kenneth T. Jackson, Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985); Thomas Sugrue, The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race & Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996; Gail Radford, Modern Housing for America: Policy Struggles in the New Deal Era (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996) .

Part of a series of articles titled Home and Homelands Exhibition: Politics.

Rosie the Riveter WWII Home Front National Historical Park

Last updated: June 11, 2024