MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C426D9.65E6CDC0" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C426D9.65E6CDC0 Content-Location: file:///C:/D32A0A34/GPRA04.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
FOR
Approved: David V. Uberuaga Superintendent =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp;
=
&nb=
sp;
Approval page.........=
...........................................................................=
..................................................................
2
Table of Contents.........=
...........................................................................=
...........................................................
3
About this plan ....................................................................= ................................................................. 5<= o:p>
Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (=
GPRA)..........................................=
.................. 5
Organization........................................................................=
.................................................................... 7
Facilities..........................................................................=
......................................................................... <=
/span>7
Financial Resources.................................................................=
.............................................................. 10
V Key Extern=
al
Factors.................................................................=
.................................................................. 1=
1
VI Annual Goals.......=
...........................................................................=
.............................................................. 12
Ia1A  =
; Disturbed
Lands ..............................=
...........................................................................=
....... 12
Ia1B =
Exotic
Species.............................=
...........................................................................=
............. 12
Ia2B  =
; Threatened
and Endangered Species..............=
............................................................... 13
Ia2X =
Native
Species of Special Concern..........=
........................................................................ =
span>13
Ia3 &=
nbsp; Air
Quality.............................=
...........................................................................=
................... 13
Ia4 &=
nbsp; Water
Quality.............................=
...........................................................................=
............. 14
Ia5 &=
nbsp; Historic
Structures on the LCS...............=
......................................................................... <=
/span>15
Ia6 &=
nbsp; Museum
Collections.........................=
...........................................................................=
...... 16
Ia7 =
C=
ultural
Landscapes on the CLI...............=
....................................................................... 16
Ia8 &=
nbsp; Archeological
Sites with Condition Assessments....=
................................................... 16
Ib2A =
Archeological
Site Inventory......................=
..................................................................... 17
Ib2B  =
; Cultural
Landscape inventory.................=
......................................................................... <=
/span>18
Ib2C =
LCS
Inventory...........................=
...........................................................................=
.............. 18
Ib2D =
Museum
Objects Catologed...................=
.......................................................................... =
18
Ib2E =
Ethnographic
Resources Inventory.................=
............................................................... 19
Ib3 &=
nbsp; Vi=
tal
Signs ..............................=
...........................................................................=
................. 19
IIa1 =
Visitor
Satisfaction........................=
...........................................................................=
.......... 20
IIa2 =
Visitor
Safety..............................=
...........................................................................=
............. 21
IIb1 =
Visitor
Understanding and Appreciation......=
................................................................. 22=
IVa3A  =
; Performance
Standards Linked to Goals...........=
.............................................................. 23
IVa4A  =
; Workforce
Diversity (min perm) ...............=
...................................................................... 23
IVa4B  =
; Workforce
Diversity (min temp) ...............=
...................................................................... 24
IVa4C  =
; Workforce
Diversity (dis perm) ...............=
....................................................................... 24
IVa4D  =
; Workforce
Diversity (dis temp) ...............=
....................................................................... 25
IVa5 =
Employee
Housing.............................=
...........................................................................=
..... 25
IVa6A  =
; Employee
Safety (Lost-time Accidents Rate)...=
............................................................. 25
IVa6B  =
; Employee
Safety (Workers Compensation—COP Hours)........................................... 26
IVa7 =
Line
Item Construction...................=
...........................................................................=
........ 26
IVb1 =
Volunteer
Hours...............................=
...........................................................................=
....... 27
IVb2A  =
; Donations
and Grants (cash donations).........=
............................................................... 27
IVb2B  =
; Donations
and Grants (friends groups) ........=
................................................................. 28=
IVb2C  =
; Donations
and Grants (coop assn) .............=
................................................................... =
28
I. INTRODUCTION
Our
Annual Performance Plan lists each annual goal in the context of its parent
mission and long-term goal. L=
ike
the parent goal, each annual goal is results, or outcome, oriented. Each goal is objective, quantified=
and
measurable, with performance measures built into each goal statement. Each =
goal
has a brief background explanation, an overview of how the goal will be
accomplished, and a statement of how accomplishment will be measured. See Section III Financial Resource=
s and
Appendix A: Budget for information on the fiscal and human resources we pla=
n to
use to achieve the desired outcomes or results.
Our
park also develops internal management documents -- annual work plans. They describe the specific activit=
ies,
services, and products that will be carried out or produced to accomplish
planned results in greater detail and list the related dollar and staff (in
terms of “full-time equivalents” or FTE) resources. Annual work
plans and budgets guide the park’s activities throughout the year.
This
Annual Performance Plan is written in part to fulfill the requirements of t=
he
Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). Congress passed this law in 1993 to
bring the federal government into the “performance management
revolution.” Performance
management is a goal-driven management concept and practice already widely
adopted by the private sector, state and local governments, and many others=
. GPRA requires federal agencies to
develop 1) a Strategic Plan, 2=
) Annual Performance Plans, and 3) =
Annual Performance Reports in ord=
er to
more effectively and efficiently manage their activities to achieve their
missions, and to more effectively communicate with the Congress and the
American people. Please see t=
he
park’s Strategic Plan for more information about GPRA and performance
management.
It should be noted, h=
owever,
that the following Annual Performance Plan is much more than just a respons=
e to
legislative mandate. The law =
was a
catalyst that caused the park staff
to reexamine its daily activities and its routine products and services, as
well as funding and staffing expended to accomplish them. It motivated and energized us to m=
ake
sure these things were well aligned with the mission of the National Park
Service and
II.
“Together we pr=
eserve,
for future generations, the natural and cultural resources in
Through a variety of =
high
quality park experiences, we promote park values, personal connections, and
responsibility for the environment in our local and global communities.
With integrity, teamw=
ork,
pride and motivation, we demonstrate environmental leadership and deepen our
understanding of the park’s ecosystems. We value our diverse range of indi=
vidual
contributions by showing respect and concern for each other and the park.
The Mountain inspires
stewardship. Its protection a=
nd
preservation is our legacy.”
Park purpose
The
park is a vital part of
…for the enjoyment of the people…for=
the
preservation from injury or spoliation of all timber, mineral deposits, nat=
ural
curiosities, or wonders…and their retention in their natural
condition…grant parcels of ground at such places shall require the
erection of buildings for the accommodation of visitors…provide again=
st
the wanton destruction of the fish and game found in the park
.
Subsequent
acts have established the NPS (1916), revised and extended the park boundar=
ies,
provided a headquarters site near
III. ACCOMPLISHING GOALS =
b>
Mount Rainier
Organi=
zation
Superintendent David =
V.
Uberuaga, with the assistance of Deputy Superintendent Randy King and the m=
anagement
team, makes up the management component of the park. The park is organized into five
operational divisions representing a broad spectrum of expertise and staff
support:
¨
Natural and
Cultural Resources
¨
Interpretat=
ion
¨
Visitor and
Resource Protection
¨
Maintenance=
¨
Administrat=
ion
The park has a staff =
of
approximately 125 permanent employees.&nbs=
p;
These employees vary in fields of expertise from generalists to
specialists. Seasonal employe=
es
augment the permanent employees during the peak visitation periods. They number up to 165 positions,
depending on avability of funding and availability of qualified
applicants. The park has an
aggressive Volunteer in Parks program which is most active during the peak
visitor season.
The
park staff will be supplemented and/or supported this year using special
project funds, contracts, the assistance or expertise of various other NPS
parks and central offices, and/or and other partners, or organizations. NPS
assistance in achieving specific park FY2004 annual goals will be provided =
by
the National Park Service’s Seattle Support Office and the Pacific We=
st
Regional office. The Universi=
ties
of Washington and
Facili=
ties
The developed areas o=
f the
park are:
¨
Tahoma W=
oods (1,200 foot elevation) - This 210-acre administ=
rative
site is located nine miles west of the park, between the villages of Ashfor=
d,
and Elbe, on SR 706. The
Administrative Headquarters for the park is located at this site. The site contains an employee hous=
ing
area, and a large greenhouse/nursery operation.
¨
Longmire=
(2,700 foot elevation) - This largest and oldest
developed area is located in the southwest corner of the park. This area was the first headquarte=
rs for
the park and contains a large Federal Landmark Historic District that inclu=
des:
a rustic employee housing area, several historic administrative buildings, =
a museum,
Wilderness Information Center/Ranger Station, a large maintenance area, the
concession-operated National Park Inn which provides food service and overn=
ight
accommodations, and the General Store.&nbs=
p;
Cougar Rock Campground, one of the two most popular campgrounds, is
located just above this development.
Longmire is the only area that is accessible to the public 24 hours,=
12
months per year.
¨
Paradise on their way to
¨
Ohanapec=
osh (1,900 foot elevation) - This area is located i=
n the
southeast corner of the park and consists of: an employee housing area, the
Ohanapecosh Ranger Station and campground registration area, the Ohanapecosh
Visitor Center, a large popular campground, and a small maintenance area. All facilities are open on a seaso=
nal
basis.
¨
¨
Sunrise
¨
Carbon R=
iver (1,880 foot elevation) - This area, which is lo=
cated
in the northwest corner of the park, is in a rain forest and has the
distinction of being the developed area that experiences the greatest amoun=
t of
precipitation in the park. A =
ranger
station and a few administrative buildings make up the facilities. There is no potable water in the
development. The road leading=
from
Carbon River Entrance to Ipsut Creek Campground and trailheads experiences
washouts which results in closures to vehicular traffic. The park’s General Managemen=
t Plan
calls for the eventual closure of the road after the next major high water
event. An expansion of the
park’s boundary is proposed to assist with providing access to the ar=
ea
should the road need to be permanently closed at some point in the future.
=
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
Park resources
The resources of
¨
At a height=
of
14,410 feet,
¨
As a part o=
f the
Pacific Ring of Fire,
¨
¨
Because of =
its
great elevation range and the extensive glacial systems,
¨
The park co=
ntains
outstanding examples of diverse vegetation communities, ranging from old gr=
owth
forest to extensive sub-alpine meadows and ancient heather.
¨
The park is=
a
visual remnant of the once widespread primeval Cascade ecosystem and provid=
es
habitat for many species representative of the region's flora and fauna.
¨
As urban
development expands, the park increases in importance as a large island of
protected open space where ecosystem processes are dominant.
¨
The park's
comprehensive NHLD--a cultural landscape district including buildings, road=
s,
the Wonderland Trail, and other landscape structures is the most significant
and complete example of NPS planning policies and park development of the f=
irst
half of the 20th Century.
¨
The develop=
ed
areas of
¨
Sometimes c=
alled
"the place where rivers begin",
¨
¨
For many
generations several Native American Indian Tribes have utilized the resourc=
es
of
¨
The park of=
fers
recreational and educational opportunities in a wide range of scenic settin=
gs,
including wildflower meadows, glaciers, and rainforests, all in a relatively
compact area that is easily accessible to a large urban population.
¨
Visitation =
and Visitor
Use
Visitation to
Any number of things can influence visitation to=
a
national park. Major world
conflicts, terrorism, fuel prices, fuel scarcity, major construction projec=
ts, the
national economy, as well as many other factors affect park visitation. In =
the
case of
Financ=
ial
Resources
Financial resources available to achieve the park= 217;s FY 2004 annual goals include a base operating budget of approximately $9,05= 2,000. Base funding, along with project m= oney, funds a permanent work force of 125 permanent positions, several term positions, and 165 seasonal positions.&nbs= p; This work force is supplemented by 37,000 hours of Volunteers-in-Par= ks service, several Student Conservation Association interns, and various youth organizations. Achieving FY 2= 004 annual goal performance targets is critically dependent on base and project= funding, volunteer assistance, partnerships, and donations. Therefore, in order to plan the year’s goals, to organize the year’s work to accomplish them, a= nd to communicate and document them, all funding and staffing sources, and maj= or alternative sources of support and work, are included in developing our Ann= ual Performance Plan.
Please
note that the goals in this plan assume a “flat budget.” We assume that there will be no maj=
or increases
in funding. Where increases in
appropriations are known or are likely, they were taken into account. Where other funding sources (donat=
ions,
fee revenues, etc.) were “reasonably assured”, they too were ta=
ken
into consideration when setting performance targets. Obviously, limits on funding const=
rain
what can be accomplished. GPR=
A,
however, is distinctly not about discussing budget shortfalls or requesting=
or
justifying additional funding.
Rather it is about planning, managing, and communicating what we can
accomplish with what we have.
Performance target numbers speak for themselves about how well funde=
d we
are to accomplish our mission.
Targets must be adjusted to reflect current funding levels. However, budget discussions are no=
t the
primary purpose of the plan.
As the
stewards of the natural and cultural resources, we recognize that a wide
variety of alternative management strategies and partnerships are required =
to
achieve our ambitious work plans. 2004 provides us with the opportunity to =
respond
to the requirements of GPRA with this Annual Performance Plan, and its
companion documents, to better plan, manage, and communicate how - and how =
well
- we are achieving our mission.
IV. MEASURING RESULTS
Measuring
success in achieving a goal depends on the nature of the goal. A goal that concerns visitor
satisfaction or understanding may be measured by a survey. A goal that concerns reaching a qu=
antifiable
activity may be measured by a percentage.&=
nbsp;
Goals concerning resources may require scheduled site visits to spec=
ific
areas to measure the results.
Goals
will also be measured through employee evaluations. With performance standards tied to=
park
goals, both interim and annual evaluations measure annual goals.
Park management and s=
taff can
plan, manage, and control much of what occurs in the park. Sometimes they c=
an
influence factors external to park boundaries that affect the park. Other
factors, such as natural events, are beyond our ability to manage or influe=
nce. Additional factors such as populat=
ion
growth, air quality, internal threats, volcanic and geologic events, weathe=
r,
human and financial resources, and the Northwest Forest Plan affect our abi=
lity
to achieve park management goals. =
span>
This is not an exhaus=
tive
list of factors. It is simply=
a
list of those factors that are likely to influence outcomes at the time this
plan was written. These facto=
rs are
discussed in much greater detail in the parks Strategic Plan for 2001 - 200=
5.
VI. ANNUAL GOALS
Annual
goals are the current year’s increments toward achieving the parkR=
17;s
long-term goals. Long-term go=
als,
in turn, are increments toward achieving mission goals.
The
park’s annual goals for fiscal year 2004 are listed below. The numbering sequence follows tha=
t of
the NPS Servicewide plan. Goal
numbers may not be consecutive.
Certain national goals had no corresponding matching goal at the park
level.
Ia: Natural and cultural resources=
and
associated values of Mount Rainier National Park are protected, restored, a=
nd
maintained in good condition and managed within their broader ecosystem and
cultural context.
Ia1 Long Term Goal:
IalA Long Term Goal - Disturbed Lands
Ia1A Disturbed lands--By
Ia1A. Annual goal:
Ia1A Disturbed Lands: By
Ia1B. Long Term Goal - Exotic Plant Species
By
Ia1B. Annual goal:
Ia1B Threatened and Endangered
Species: By
Ia2B Long Term Goal:
Ia2B Threatened and Endangered Species (stable):=
by
Ia2B. Annual Goal:
By
Ia2X Long Term Goal:
Ia2X Native Species of Special Concern: By
Ia2X. Annual Goal:
Goal Achieved prior to 2004.
Ia3 Long Term Goal:
Ia3 Air Quality: By
Ia3. Annual Goal:
Ia3 Air Quality: By September 30, 2004, visibility,
atmospheric deposition, and ozone measurements will be obtained from a mini=
mum
of three sites within the park, vital signs for air quality related values =
will
be identified, and park air quality will be protected through cooperation a=
nd
coordination with federal, state and local regulatory entities.
Monitoring
of visibility, atmospheric deposition, and ozone will indicate that Mount
Rainier Class I air quality has not degraded from 1997 baseline conditions.=
In
order to provide data to measure results, Paradise
The resource
management staff will work closely with regulatory agencies and private
industry in improving air quality I the park and in the region. This will be accomplished by revie=
wing
air quality permits, collaborating on monitoring efforts, and collaborating
with State and Regional regulators in development of their State Implementa=
tion
Plans.
The resource
management staff will coordinate with technical specialists and NPS Air
Resources Division to develop indicators, sampling design, and long-term
monitoring strategies for assessing status and trends in air quality related
values in the park and
Air
pollution resulting from park operations will improve or not be degraded by
maintaining and repairing heating and ventilation systems, converting to
cleaner fuels, converting to solar power where feasible, and addressing some
management issues in park residences and campgrounds. The resource management and mainte=
nance
staffs will work closely with the NPS Air Resources Division to identify
emission sources resulting from park operations, and to develop mitigation
strategies to reduce emissions and improve fuel efficiency.
The
NPS Air Resources Division reports results for this goal.
Ia4 Long Term Goal:
Ia4 Water Quality: By
Ia4. Annual Goal:
Ia4 Water Quality: By
In
Historical
data based on short-term and infrequent studies may provide inaccurate
information to assess the status and trends of aquatic ecosystems. Long-term monitoring is essential =
to
reduce the uncertainty. Such
information is particularly important to park management given the potentia=
l effects
of atmospheric deposition and global climate change. A long-term monitoring program on
selected lakes and streams is needed to document changing conditions caused=
by
natural phenomena and human related activities. It is clear from our past limnolog=
ical
data from these lakes that considerable variation already exists for many
components of these aquatic ecosystems.&nb=
sp;
Although some evidence of the impacts of atmospheric deposition is a=
vailable
for zooplankton assemblages and introduced trout on native salamander
populations in high mountain lakes in the west, little is known about how t=
here
lakes respond to environmental changes.
Low-level
disturbances from human-related activities may be masked by natural
variability. Managers need to=
look
for changes in trajectories of lake and stream components through time. Subtle effects on aquatic ecosyste=
ms should
not be de-emphasized or ignored.
In
order to measure this goal, water quality of 10 representative lakes and six
representative stream sites will be measured over a five year period. Chemical parameters that will be
measured include pH, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen, ANC, cations, =
anions,
nutrients, transparency (lakes), turbidity (streams), and total and dissolv=
ed
solids (streams). Physical
parameters will include transparency and bathymetry for lakes, and stream
habitat for streams. Biological parameters that will be measured include
plankton, benthic invertebrates, fish and amphibians. To further measure this goal,
information will continue to be gathered on park wetlands status and functi=
on
and fish and amphibian presence and distribution in aquatic ecosystems
throughout the park.
The resource
management staff will coordinate with technical specialists to develop
indicators, sampling design, and long-term monitoring strategies for assess=
ing
status and trends in aquatic ecosystems in the park and in the North Coast
Cascades Ecosystem Network.
Ia5 Long Term Goal:
Ia5 Historic Structures: By
Ia5. Annual Goal:
Ia5 Historic Structures: By
We
will continue to perform routine maintenance to keep the baseline 64 struct=
ures
in good condition. Rehabilitation or major repairs will be undertaken to
improve the condition of at least one front or back country LCS structure. =
Work
is scheduled to be completed on the Guide House and to begin on the Sunrise
Lodge (new roofing and siding) and possibly L-110, a housing unit at Longmi=
re.
Ia6 Long Term Goal:
Ia6 Museum Collections: By
Ia6. Annual Goal:
Ia6 Museum Collections: By
The Museum
Curator will continue to address deficiencies stated in the checklist.
Ia7 Long Term Goal:
Ia7 Cultural Landscapes: By
Ia7. Annual Goal:
Ia7 Cultural Landscapes: By
Work
continues on general cyclic and/or rehabilitation efforts on a portion
(bridges, trail tread, drainage bars, etc.) on the 93-mile Wonderland Trail=
, a
recognized contributing element of the park’s National Historic Landm=
ark
District.
Planning
for the replacement of the
Ia8 Long Term Goal:
Ia8 Archeological Sites: By September 30, 2005, 51% (26 of 51) of M=
ount
Rainier National Park archaeological sites listed on the FY 1999 National P=
ark
Service Archaeological Sites Management Information System (ASMIS), with
condition assessments, are in good condition.
Ia8. Annual Goal:
Ia8 Archeological Sites: By
The
current set of archaeological sites recorded in
Condition
Assessment Requirements: Prop=
erties
initially evaluated at greatest risk of damage will be given highest
priority. Remaining propertie=
s will
be selected in a manner that represents landforms and major ecological zones
widely distributed around the mountain.
Ib.
Ib
The National Park Service at
Ib2A Long Term Goal:
Ib2A Archeological Baseline: By September 30, 2005, the number of M=
ount
Rainier National Park archaeological sites inventoried, evaluated and liste=
d in
the National Park Service ASMIS is increased from 51 in FY 1999 to 61 (20%
increase).
Ib2A. Annual Goal:
Ib2A Archeological Baseline: By September 30, 2004 work by the
Central Washington University Archeological Field School to expand the exis=
ting
site database by evaluating undocumented sites and continued excavations at=
one
site in the park will continue to be supervised by the Cultural Resource
Specialist during FY2004.
Anticipated
addition of an Archeological Technician will improve compliance inventory
capacity and, with the Cultural Resource Specialist, will facilitate additi=
onal
research directed inventory. =
As of
2003, 147 sites have been added to the system. This exceeds the original goal of =
adding
70 sites to the database.
Additional
archeological site survey work is needed to improve the site database, and
enhance our understanding of site density and distribution patterns in the
park. These data not only hel=
p us
to better manage the park’s archaeological resources, but help to dev=
elop
better informed interpretive efforts related to prehistoric and historic hu=
man
use of park landscapes.
Ib2B Long Term Goal:
Ib2B Cultural Landscape Baseline: By September 3=
0,
2005, the number of Mount Rainier National Park’s cultural landscapes
inventoried, evaluated, and entered on the National Park Service Cultural
Landscape Inventory (CLI) at Level II is increased from 5 in FY1999 to 12 (=
140%
increase).
Ib2B. Annual Goal:
Ib2B Cultural Landscape Baseline:<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> By
Inventory
of the 93-mile Wonderland Trail at Level II will continue, adding additional
surveyed mileage to the 45-miles already inventoried. In FY2004 inventory w=
ork
at
Ib2C Long Term Goal:
Ib2C Historic Structures Baseline: By September =
30,
2005, the number of structures on the 1999 List of Classified Structures (L=
CS)
for Mount Rainier National Park has been increased from 127 to 158 to refle=
ct
the new historic structures added with the designation of the Mount Rainier
National Historic Landmark District in 1997, and all of the 158 entries have
been updated to reflect their current condition.
Ib2C. Annual Goal:
Ib2C Historic Structure:  =
;By
148
out of 158 identified structures have been entered into the LCS system as o=
f
Ib2D Long Term Goal:
Ib2D Cataloging Museum Objects: By
Ib2D. Annual Goal:
Ib2D
The
Museum curator will accession, identify, house and catalog 500 ANCS+ catalog
records for backlog natural history and historic objects. It should be noted that the baseli=
ne
information for the goal was incorrect and the annual accomplishment was
adjusted downward to reflect this error.&n=
bsp;
The cumulative goal for 2004 is 732606 objects.
Ib2E Long Term Goal:
Ib2E Ethnographic Resources Baseline: By September 30, 2005, the nu=
mber
of Mount Rainier National Park ethnographic resources inventoried, evaluated
and entered on the National Park Service Ethnographic Resources Inventory
(ERIO) is increased from 0 in FY 1999 to 6 (100% increase).
Ib2E. Annual Goal:
Ib2E Ethnographic Resources
Baseline: By
Ethnographic
resources consist of subsistence and ceremonial locales and sites, structur=
es,
objects and landscapes assigned cultural significance by traditional users;=
and
perceived as meaningful to their identity as a group and survival of their =
way
of life. Subsistence and cere=
monial
uses of
Ib3 Long Term Goal:
Ib3 Vital Signs: By
Ib3. Annual Goal:
Ib3 Vital Signs: By
Complete
a scoping workshop involving experts from within and outside the NPS who are
knowledgeable about park ecosystems to identify vital signs for the park th=
at
may contribute to a network monitoring program for assessing ecosystem heal=
th.
Continue
to serve on the technical advisory committee for the
GOAL CATEGO=
RY II:
PROVIDE FOR THE PUBLIC ENJOYMENT AND VISITOR EXPERIENCE OF PARKS
IIa.
IIa
Visitors safely enjoy and are satisfied with the availability, accessibilit=
y,
diversity, and quality of park facilities, services, and appropriate recrea=
tional
opportunities at
IIa1 Long Term Goal:
IIa1 Visitor Satisfaction: By
IIa1. Annual Goal:
IIal Visitor Satisfaction: By
Visitor
satisfaction and enjoyment are a fundamental part of the visitor
experience.
Satisfaction
will be achieved by assuring that:
Park
facilities and recreation and recreational access will be available to the
public by the timely opening of roads and trails in the spring season. Concise informational signage will
provide the visitor with the information necessary to select the facilities=
and
services they desire. Accessi=
bility
for special populations will be enhanced through a continual upgrade and
improvement in our public buildings.
Consistent power will be provided to the visitor through upkeep and
maintenance of the power grid, when an outage does occur, timely restoratio=
n of
power using the secondary power systems will minimize visitor discomfort. Visitors will enjoy well-stocked a=
nd
maintained comfort stations located in strategic areas throughout the park =
with
an ample number of comfort stations to handle the maximum capacity crowds.
Water fountains will work and closures of facilities due to plumbing and bu=
ilding
repairs will be kept to a minimum.
Grounds will be well maintained and kept free of litter and natural
debris. Garbage collection wi=
ll be
routine and efficient, providing visitors with a comfortable controlled
environment when visiting the public buildings and indoor exhibits. Effective supervision will enhance=
the
facility operations and maintenance unit, and further the efficiency of park
facility maintenance staff, by increasing service levels; the visitor will
realize additional benefit and enjoyment.
Concession
operations will be managed with NPS over-sight, so that service and cleanli=
ness
will be optimized. The visito=
r will
be provided with a range of appropriate accommodations and services as a
variety of price and service levels.
Visitors
to the park will enjoy the availability and diversity of a well-maintained
trail system. A groomed snow play area enhances wintertime recreational
back-country waste is managed and privy maintenance services are provided f=
or
the backcountry user. Current=
trail
and campsite information is available from Wilderness Rangers encountered in
the park’s outback. Visitors are assisted and the image of the park a=
nd
its values will increase the visitors overall satisfaction through contact =
and
education.
Visitor
satisfaction is achieved through efficient, effective and proactive
administration, supervision and management of all built and natural facilit=
ies
within its boundaries. Field
personnel will have the logistical support from the Administration and
Procurement Offices to enable them to operate at 100% effectiveness. Equipment will be well maintained =
and
available for utilization. On=
ly the
best personnel will be recruited and hired through the merit system, thus
improving overall organizational effectiveness and visitor satisfaction.
IIa2 Long Term Goal:
IIa2 Visitor Safety: By
IIa2. Annual Goal:
IIa2 Visitor Safety: By
The
reporting requirement for this goal changed from a baseline rate to a total
number of incidents per year. This
number will decline to no more than 113 incidents per year by 2005. 76
incidents were tabulated in 2003.
To
ensure the safety of visitors, park staff will provide services that direct=
ly
relate and contribute to the safety and security of visitors. This includes, but is not limited =
to,
services such as law enforcement, resource protection, search and rescue, a=
nd
criminal investigations. Staf=
f will
utilize preventative and educational messages to the visiting public in are=
as
such as safe vehicular travel on mountainous roads, Wilderness/backcountry,=
and
climbing. Staff will identify,
investigate, and provide correcting or mitigating sources of injury and
property damage experienced by visitors.
IIb.
IIb.
Park visitors and the general public understand and appreciate the preserva=
tion
of
IIb1 Long Term Goal:
IIb1 Visitor Understanding: By
IIb1 Annual Goal:
Visitor Understanding: By
Based
on a visitor survey, 85% of the visitors to
Approximately
2 million people will visit
The
park will:
·
Conduct tra=
ining
sessions for concessionaires and park staff regarding park mission, values,
resources, and operations.
·
Provide per=
sonal
services interpretive programs that are inclusive of multiple points of vie=
w at
·
Refine the
Outreach Program to convey basic park values to constituents and to develop
relationships and relevance with diverse external audiences.
·
Continue to
implement the Comprehensive Interpretive Plan to ensure presentation of park
significance and meanings.
·
Continue to
network with education and scientific communities on programs and projects
including
·
Enhance and
improve the presentation and content of interpretive media through planning=
and
fabrication of new waysides and planning new exhibits for
&nbs=
p; =
Goal
achievement will be measured by the Visitor Survey Card administered by the
Cooperative Park Studies Unit and the Division of Interpretation and Educat=
ion
in August.
GOAL CATEGORY III: STRENGTHEN AND
PRESERVE NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES AND ENHANCE RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNIT=
IES
MANAGED BY PARTNERS
IIIa.
IIIa Natural and cultural resources are
conserved through formal partnership programs. There are no park goals in t=
his
category so no service wide goals are listed.
IVa.
IVa The National Park Service at
IVa3 Long Term Goal:
IVa3A Workforce Development and Performance-Empl=
oyee
Performance Standards: By
IVa3. Annual Goal:
IVa3A Workforce Development and
Performance-Employee Performance Standards: By
The
unit of measurement for this goal is now the actual number of employee
performance standards rather than the percentage. By 2005, 114 employees will have
performance standards that are linked to strategic and annual performance
goals.
On
an annual basis, all employees are required to be given and Employee
Performance Plan and Results Report (DI02002). This performance plan highlights t=
he
main tasks that the employee is expected to accomplish during the year. This goal attempts to link individ=
ual
employee performance to the broader goals listed in the NPS Strategic Plan =
and
individual park work plans. In
addition, position competencies have been added to the goal. Theoretically it further solidifie=
s the
links between individual performance and organizational goals.
IVa4A Long Term Goal:
IVa4A Workforce Diversity-Permanent Women and
Minorities: By
IVa4A. Annual Goal:
IVa4A Workforce Diversity-Permanent
Women and Minorities: by
The
unit of measurement for this goal has changed to the number of employees ra=
ther
than the percentage of the workforce.
IVa4B Long Term Goal:
IVa4B Workforce Diversity-Temporary/Seasonal Wom=
en and
Minorities: By
IVa4B. Annual Goal:
IVa4B Workforce
Diversity-Temporary/Seasonal Women and Minorities: By
The
unit of measurement for this goal has changed to the number of employees ra=
ther
than the percentage of the workforce.
IVa4C Long Term Goal:
IVa4C Workforce Diversity – Permanent Empl=
oyees
with Disabilities: By
IVa4C. Annual Goal:
&nbs=
p; =
IVa4C
Workforce Diversity-Permanent Employees with Disabilities: By
The
unit of measurement for this goal has changed to the number of employees ra=
ther
than the percentage of the workforce.
The long term (FY 2005) goal is to
assure that at least two positions are encumbered with by individuals with
disabilities.
IVa4D Long Term Goal:
IVa4D Workforce Diversity – Temporary/Seas=
onal
Employees with Disabilities: By
Note: Baseline information for this goal=
has
been adjusted to 2000 as a result of the Service wide plan’s
revision/breakout of the goal into four elements subsequent to the 1999
baseline data compilation.
IVa4D Annual Goal:
Temporary/Seasonal Employees with
Disabilities: By
The Service
wide goal is to increase underrepresented groups in permanent/term position=
s over
the 1999 baseline by 25% in the targeted series. The unit of measurement for this g=
oal
has changed to the number of employees rather than the percentage of the
workforce. The GS-083 Police
Officer, GS-170 Historian, GS-301 Administrative Programs, and the GS-1010
Exhibits Specialist series are not represented at MORA. Of the remaining target series, GS=
-025
Park Ranger, GS-193 Museum Curator, and GS-1640 Facility Manager, there are=
26
positions of which eight, are occupied by target group employees. The park is utilizing position
management tools such as bridge series positions and recruitment for upward
mobility positions, as well as alternative hiring authorities to maximize
opportunities for diversity in these series.
IVa5 Long Term Goal:
IVa5 Employee Housing: By September 30, 2005, 50% of empl=
oyee
housing units at Mount Rainier, classified as being in poor or fair conditi=
on
in 1997, have been removed, replaced, or upgraded to good condition.
IVa5. Annual Goal:
IVa5 Employee Housing: By
September 30, 2004, 12 of 12 of Mount Rainier’s employee housing unit=
s,
classified as being in poor or fair condition in 1997, have been removed,
replaced, or upgraded to good condition.
This
goal has been modified based on current FMSS data. The reporting requirement was also
changed from a percentage to the actual number of units.
IVa6 Long Term Goal:
IVa6A Employee Safety – Lost-time Injuries=
: By
September 30, 2005, the number of Mount Rainier National Park employee
lost-time injuries is reduced from the FY 1992 - FY 1996 five year annual
average of 8.4 to 4 (55% reduction).
IVA6. Annual Goal:
IVa6A Employee Safety - Lost-time
Injuries: By
The
Park Safety Action Plan will set out a plan of action to change unsafe work
behaviors that have been identified through root cause investigations of
accidents, facility inspections, and the Safety Evaluation Profile. The Park
Safety Committee in partnership with the safety office will continue,
aggressively, to implement the Action Plan.
The
Management Safety Action Plan will be updated and new action items will be
identified. Emphasis will be placed on the JHA system, a broad based safety
competence training program for all employees, inclusion of safety in all
regular performance appraisals, and further collaborative work with concess=
ions
and the union on the Safety Program.
Goal
achievement will be monitored, measured, and verified by use of the DOI - S=
MIS
system.
IVa6B Long Term Goal:
IVa6B Employee Safety – Continuation of Pa=
y: By
IVa6B. Annual Goal:
IVa6B Employee Safety –
Continuation of Pay: By
IVa7 Long Term Goal:
IVa7. Line-Item Construction: By
IVa7. Annual Goal:
IVa7 Line Item Construction: By
Planning
for the replacement of the
Goal
achievement will be monitored, measured, and verified during project planni=
ng,
design, and construction phases to ensure projects are within cost, schedul=
e,
and construction parameters.
IVb. The National Park Service at
IVb1 Long Term Goal:
IVb1 Volunteer Hours: By September 30, 2005, the
number of Mount Rainier National Park volunteer hours is increased from 52,=
000
in FY97 to 54,080 (a 4% total increase over eight years, from 1997-2005.)
IVb1. Annual goal:
IVb1 Volunteer Hours: By
The
target number for this goal has been modified to reflect actual number of h=
ours
achieved in FY 2003 while factoring-in a proportional increase for FY-2004 =
and
2005.
To
meet our long and short term goals for increasing the number of volunteer h=
ours,
we will focus on our current core group while identifying candidates for
additional volunteer opportunities. We will also actively identify projects=
of
interest and enhance communications between park coordinators and the volun=
teer
workforce.
IVb2A Long
Term Goal:
IVb2 Donations and Grants:
IVb2A — Cash donations are increased by 3.=
6%
[from $14,476.00 in 1998 to $15,000.00.
IVb2A. Annual goal:
IVb2A Cash donations and grants: By
IVb2B Long Term Goal:
IVb2B — Value of donations, grants, and se=
rvices
from Friends Groups and other organizations are increased to $50,000.00.
IVb2B. Annual Goal:
IvB2b Cash Value of In-kind
Donations: By
The
FY 2004 and 2005 annual goals have been modified to reflect realistic
targets. The park has only be=
en
able to meet the original target in one out of three years.
clearly is in concert with the NPS mission statement. New management in “The Fund” will assist in increasing viable projects throughout the park.<= o:p>
IVb2C Long Term Goal:
IVb2C — Value of donations, grants, and se=
rvices
from Cooperating Associations are increased by 35% [from $19,000.00 in 1997=
to
$25,600.00].
IVb2C. Annual Goal:
IVb2C Cash Value of In-kind Donati=
ons
from Northwest Interpretive Association: By
The
FY 2004 and 2005 annual goals have been modified to reflect realistic
targets. The park has never m=
et the
original target over the past three years.
The
Northwest Interpretive Association, working through a cooperative agreement
with
The
support and dedication to
VII. ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
CONTRIBUTORS
Superintendent David =
V.
Uberuaga and Deputy Superintendent Randy King manage the Plan by assigning
"Goalkeepers" to each=
of
the park goals. These Goalkee=
pers are
responsible for:
¨
Identifying=
and
describing the goal
¨
Target
¨
Baseline
¨
Desired con=
dition
¨
Actual chan=
ges
The Goalkeepers are:<= o:p>
GOAL &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; GOALKEEPER
Ia1A Restoring Formerly Developed
Lands &n=
bsp;  =
; Laurie
Kurth
Ia1B Containing Exotic Plant
Species =
&nb=
sp; =
Laurie
Kurth
Ia2B Stable T&E Species=
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Jim
Schaberl
Ia2X Native Species Special
Concern =
&nb=
sp; =
Jim
Schaberl
Ia3 Air =
Quality
in Class I Parks &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
Barbara
Samora
Ia4 Water
Quality =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; Barbara
Samora
Ia5 Hist=
oric
Structures &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; Ellen
Gage
Ia6
Ia7 Cult=
ural
Landscapes &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; Susan
Dolan
Ia8 Arch=
eological
Sites &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; Greg
Burtchard
Ib2A Archaeological Site Inventor=
y &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Greg
Burtchard
Ib2B Cultural Landscape
Inventory &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Susan
Dolan
Ib2C LCS Inventory &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; El=
len
Gage
Ib2D Museum Objects Cataloged &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Deborah
Osterberg
Ib2E Ethnographic Resources
Inventoried &n=
bsp;  =
; <=
/span>Greg
Burtchard
Ib3 Vital Sign=
s &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Roger
Andrascik
IIa1 Visitor Satisfac=
tion &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Dan
Blackwell
IIa2 Visitor Safety &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Dave
Ashe
IIb1 Visitor
Understanding and Appreciation &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Sheri
Forbes
IVa3A Performance Standards Linked to Goals
IVa4A Diversity of the Labor Force (min perm)<=
span
style=3D'mso-tab-count:2'> &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Patty
Klump
IVa4B Diversity of the Labor Force (min temp)<=
span
style=3D'mso-tab-count:2'> &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Patty
Klump
IVa4C Diversity of the Labor Force (disab perm=
) &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Patty
Klump
IVa4D Diversity of the Labor Force (disab temp=
) &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Patty
Klump
IVa5 Housing Units Upgraded=
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Craig
Hecht
IVa6A Lost Time Injury Rate =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; Mike
Sorenson
IVa6B Continuation of pay hours &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Patty
Klump
Iva7 Line item Construction=
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Eric
Walkinshaw
IVb1 Volunteer Hours &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; Lee
Taylor
IVb2A Donations and Grants - Cash Donations &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Donna
Mettler
IVb2B Donations and Grants - Friends Groups
IVb2C Donations and Grants - Coop. Assn. &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; Lee
Taylor
Concessions Analyst, =
Chris
Jones, who temporarily serves as the park GPRA Coordinator, performed data =
input.
=
&nb=
sp; =
|
PAGE=
|
|
PAGE=
22 |