The
following reasonable alternatives were developed in discussions among an
interdisciplinary team of park preparers and consultants, as identified later
in this document.
Agate’s current fire management policy (AGFO 1988) is
as follows.
A.
Suppress, by
utilizing a direct control strategy, all wildfires that threaten human life,
developed property, to leave park boundaries, or to adversely impact cultural (paleontological [sic]
or historic) resources.
B.
Suppress, by
utilizing a containment strategy, all other wildfires when they reach an
existing firebreak or a suitable location to initiate a backfire.
C.
Suppression will
be done in a prompt, safe, aggressive and cost effective manner commensurate
with minimum damage to park resources.
Should
an outside agency participate in the suppression of fire with the Monument, it
must be recognized that Monument personnel are ultimately responsible for the
protection of natural and cultural resources. The use of heavy equipment, e.g.,
bulldozers or other vehicles which may excessively disturb surface or
subsurface resources will not be allowed except to save human life. Smaller,
less intrusive, vehicles will be used only when other methods of extinguishing
the fire are not practical.
Wildland fire suppression activities at Agate work from
established roads and trails throughout the park, including
Under Alternative 1, no
mechanical reduction (mowing) of hazardous fuels for fire management is
authorized, nor is the use of prescribed fire for general fuel load reduction. Mowing
around the
The use of prescribed fire to enhance resources is
also not authorized if this alternative is accepted. A new Agate fire
management plan will be developed to comply with current nationwide Service
policy, but the park-specific policy underlying that plan will remain
essentially unchanged from what it has been since 1988.
Inferred within this wildland
fire management policy is a directive to wet down all park structures,
including the
Agate managers prefer to
implement a multi-faceted fire management program at the park that includes
suppression of wildland fires as discussed under
Alternative 1, as well as the use of prescribed fire to reduce Agate’s
hazardous fuel load. The park would like to use prescribed fire to enhance the
park’s native ecology, specifically to reduce the current infestation of cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum); reduce the Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense)
seedbed and infiltration among willows that persists despite an active thistle
control program (Knudson 2003); and possibly increase the proportion of native
forbs in the Agate prairie.
Agate is set within steep
valley walls and draws, with unpredictable updrafts. In the main
As mentioned under the
discussion of Alternative 1, prior to conducting a prescribed fire at Agate
firefighters would be provided with resource sensitivity maps, so those areas
can be protected from mechanical disturbance or provided special protection as
needed.
As mentioned previously,
Agate participates in the Northern Great Plains Area Fire Management group as
well as under a Mutual Aid agreement with the Harrison Rural Fire Protection
District. Firefighters and engines from these organizations, as well as other
local and federal firefighting units in the area, would be called on to
participate in any prescribed fire on Agate lands. A Fire Management Plan (see
attached) and included Fire Effects Monitoring Plan has been developed to
implement Alternative 2 use of prescribed fire, should that be the accepted
alternative.
Alternative 3. Fire Management Program includes
Suppression and Mowing without Prescribed Fire
Table 1. Alternatives and Associated Environmental Impacts
|
AFFECTED
ENVIRONMENT: |
1 (No New Action; Suppression only) |
2 (Suppression and Prescribed Fire
[PREFERRED]) |
3 (Suppression and Mowing) |
|
Archeological
Sites |
Negligible to minor adverse
direct impacts |
||
|
Historic Properties, including Cultural Landscapes
and Traditional Cultural Properties |
Negligible impacts |
||
|
Ethnographic Resources |
Negligible impacts |
||
|
Fossils and Associated Geological Deposits |
Negligible impacts |
||
|
Soils |
Negligible impacts |
Moderate direct adverse
impacts |
|
|
Flora
(general) |
Minor direct beneficial impacts |
||
|
Fauna
(general) |
Negligible impacts |
||
|
Wetlands
and Floodplains |
Minor direct
beneficial impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
Minor direct
beneficial impacts |
Minor direct
beneficial impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
|
Threatened
and Endangered Species |
No such species in the park |
||
|
Exotic
Species |
Minor site-specific
and local direct beneficial impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
Moderate site-specific and
local direct beneficial impact |
Minor site-specific and
local direct beneficial impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
|
State-Listed Rare Plants |
Negligible impact |
Minor direct adverse impact |
|
|
Fuel Load |
Minor direct beneficial
impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
Moderate beneficial impact |
Minor direct beneficial
impact possible, otherwise negligible impact |
|
Hydrological Resources |
Negligible direct
site-specific and local adverse impact |
||
|
Air
Resources |
Minor direct site-specific
and local adverse impact |
||
|
Socioeconomic
Resources, including Health and Safety and Environmental Justice |
Minor local indirect
beneficial impact possible, otherwise negligible impact except for risk of
fire escape |
Minor local indirect
beneficial impact, except for risk of fire escape |
Minor local indirect
beneficial impact |
Agate’s long-term objective
is to identify and preserve all the cultural resources found on its fee lands,
as well as identify those cultural resources found on non-federal lands within
the Agate boundaries. The area of cultural resource analysis is Agate fee-owned
lands.
Archeological Sites
Most of Agate’s
surface-evident archeological sites (95) have been inventoried by qualified
specialists over the past 25 years, and all of these sites are known or
presumed to be in good condition. Field condition assessment of all known sites
will be documented during 2004. Figure 2 indicates the areas of documented site
inventory. Most of the known sites only have components older than 150 years,
with flaked stone artifacts or pieces of pottery, and all of the known deposits
are sparse, even to depths of 120cm (Clark 1993:12). Test excavations (e.g.,
Clark 1993, 1994; Olinger 1980; Wandsnider
and MacDonell 1997) have provided little information
about the period(s) in which the sites were occupied. While there are one or
two artifacts that were probably first manufactured up to 9,000 years ago, most
of the material
appears
to date to the last thousand years. However, as mentioned previously, the Agate
landscape has probably been used by people for the past 11,000 years.
![]()

Historic Properties (including Cultural Landscapes and
Traditional Cultural Properties)
The original archeological surveys of Agate lands (Kay 1975)
inventoried a large number of sites in part because cattle grazing had only
ended the previous year and the ground surface was readily apparent. By the
time Nickel (2002) resurveyed the northern portions of the park in 1996, the
buildup of grass and duff made the surface difficult to see. There is evidence of two historic homesteads
and one historic Euroamerican gravesite in the Agate
archeological record, and there are probably a few more remnants of the early
twentieth century homesteading effort in the
Adverse impacts to these resources would cause the loss of scientific
and humanistic information values, either from disturbance of the archeological
site context or from changes in the artifact form (e.g., potlidding
of flaked stone artifacts so as to modify or destroy their temporally
diagnostic scar patterns, melting of glass artifacts, or burning of structural
timbers).
Agate’s Bone Cabin Complex (NeHBS
#SX00-28) is a historic property listed on the National Register of Historic
Places (
All the lands within the
Agate park boundaries are in the process of being documented and nominated to
the National Register as a cultural landscape, with several component
landscapes. The Red Cloud Campsite component landscape (NPS 2002b), which
includes federal fee-owned lands south of the Niobrara River on the east side
of and immediately adjacent to S. H. 29, is included within the Red Cloud
Campsite area. There are no surface-evident remnants of the historic activities
associated with this component landscape. The historic Fort Laramie-Fort
Robinson freight trail is reported to have traversed the length of the park on
the north side of the
One complex of a dozen traditional cultural properties
has been identified at Agate by the Lakota (LeBeau
2002), and the park is in the process of nominating this complex to the
National Register of Historic Places as the Crazy Buffalo Complex Traditional
Cultural Property. The complex consists of humanly constructed and natural rock
and topographic features associated with the Lakota Crazy Buffalo tradition and
related ceremonies. The Complex is considered to be a sacred site. Traditional
cultural properties are considered by Native Americans to be a part of the
natural landscape and ecological system, as is fire, and therefore modification
of them by fire would be a natural event. However, disturbance of these
properties by mechanical disturbance or inappropriate human behavior could be
an adverse impact to them, as the sacred nature of the property could be
violated.
Historic properties are
eligible for listing on the National Register because, in part, of their
integrity. These properties would be adversely affected if fire or fire
suppression activities cause the properties to lose their integrity and become
ineligible for the Register.
Ethnographic Resources
Agate's ethnographic resources include places, sites,
structures, landscapes, and objects, which may or may not be historic or
traditional cultural properties or archeological sites. As mentioned
previously, these are of concern to 31 affiliated Native American tribes, as
well as to the regional Euroamerican ranching
community. Again, as mentioned previously, these are all considered to be part
of Agate's environment that could be affected by the proposed fire program. As
discussed above, these properties are considered by Native Americans to be a
part of the natural landscape and ecological system, as is fire, and therefore
modification of them by fire would be a natural event. However, disturbance of
these properties by mechanical disturbance or inappropriate human behavior
would be an adverse impact to them, as (if an attribute) the sacred nature of
the property could be violated.
Agate’s long-term objective
is to identify and preserve all the paleontological
resources on its fee lands, as well as identify the geological and biological
resources there (including soils, flora and fauna, hydrology, and air) and
preserve the habitat and faunal community insofar as is appropriate and
feasible. Although difficult to achieve in a changed modern world, the
Service’s goal is to restore an Agate ecosystem to a state comparable to that
found on these lands in the late nineteenth century. The area of biological and
geological resource analysis is the Agate fee-owned lands.
Fossil and Associated Geological Deposits
LOCALITY
NAME
|
PROXIMITY TO TRAIL
|
DOCUMEN-TATION
|
Agate Ash Dated Section
|
no
|
yes
|
Agate Ash Outcrops (3 localities)
|
no
|
yes
|
Agate Ash Quarry
|
no
|
no
|
Agate Road Quarry
|
no
|
no
|
Artiodactyl Locality I
|
no
|
no
|
Artiodactyl Locality II
|
no
|
no
|
Beardog Hill
|
no
|
yes
|
|
no
|
no
|
Carnegie Hill North Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
Carnegie Hill Northwest Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
Carnegie Hill South Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
Carnegie Hill Southwest Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
Carnegie Hill West Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
Carnegie Quarry 3
|
no
|
yes
|
Daemonelix Group
|
yes
|
no
|
Deep Daemonelix
|
yes
|
no
|
Double
Daemonelix
|
yes
|
no
|
Hickey Locality
|
no
|
no
|
North Ridge
|
no
|
no
|
North Ridge (Carnegie Quarry A)
|
no
|
yes
|
North Ridge North Outcrop
|
no
|
no
|
North Ridge South Outcrop
|
no
|
yes
|
Paleodunes
|
yes
|
no
|
Paleocastor skull
|
no
|
no
|
Stenomylus Quarry
|
no
|
no
|
University Hill
|
yes
|
yes
|
University Quarry
|
yes
|
yes
|
These localities are identified on Agate’s GIS
database, and their general area will be identified on sensitivity maps to be
protected and/or avoided during wildland fire suppression
or prescribed wildfire.
Soils
Agate’s soils (NRCS 1998) are mapped and those data
are available as a rectified AGFO GIS data layer; they are summarized in Table
3 and their distribution illustrated in Figure 3. The darkest soils represent
the Niobrara River wetlands (Lc, Bh
soils), while the major terraces with their native grasslands and exotic cheatgrass (OwB, AwD soils) and frequent archeological associations, and the
higher slopes (AwE soils) are represented in the
intermediate grays. The butte tops and breaks are the lightest gray to white (BxE, RkG, TbG
soils) and have frequent traditional cultural property and fossil/geological
associations. The complex terrain is illustrated by the interfingering
of the various soil distributions.
The Agate soils are categorized as "Well Drained
and Somewhat Excessively Drained, Sandy and Loamy Soils on Hillslopes,
Alluvial Fans, and Stream Terraces" in either the Mitchell-Otero-Ashollow or Otero-Las Animas-Lisco
associations (NRCS 1998). The soils receive little rainfall during the summer,
which can result in soil blowing. Once vegetation is crushed, and indentations
are made in the friable topsoil, the damage to vegetation and soil lasts for
many growing seasons but would not change the fundamental nature of the soils.
Table 3.
|
SYMBOL |
SOIL NAME |
COMMENT |
|
AwD |
Ashollow loamy very fine sand, 3%-9% slopes |
Terraces about 4420’
elevation |
|
AwE |
Ashollow loamy very fine sand, 9%-20% slopes |
Slopes above the 4420’
terraces |
|
Bh |
Bigwinder fine sandy loam, 0%-1% slopes |
River channel, wetlands |
|
BxE |
Busher-Tassel complex, 6%-20% slopes |
Ridges either side of the
Fossil Hills |
|
Lc |
Las Animas-Lisco complex, 0%-2% slopes, occasionally flooded |
Terrace 1’-2’ above water
level |
|
OwB |
Otero loamy very fine sand,
0%-3% slopes |
Terraces about 4400’
elevation; |
|
RkG |
Rock outcrop-Tassel
complex, 9%-70% slopes |
Fossil Hills, Stenomylus Quarry hill |
|
TbG |
Tassel-Ashollow-Rock
outcrop complex, 9%-60% slopes |
Tableland, with Daemonelix in the edges of these |

Figure 3.
Flora
(general)
Agate has a relatively complete inventory of its plant
community, which has been mapped (http://biology.usgs.gov/npsveg/AGFO),
and the lichens have been documented (Wetmore 1998). Agate is part of the
Prairie Cluster Long-Term Ecological Monitoring program (DeBacker
and Mlekush 2000, Thomas et al. 2001), and is a
member of the Northern Great Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network (2001).
The vegetation communities are structured into
wetlands, terrace and slope mixed prairie grasslands, and valley breaks and
tablelands. The park is
…in the central portion of the northern mixed-grass
prairie of the high plains.
Two-thirds of the park’s 3,000 acres consist of mixed grass prairie, the most
common type being sandreed/sand bluestem
prairie. Needle & thread/blue grama prairie occurs on shoulders of flat-topped hills and
on eroding sandstone slopes on the sides of hills, while western wheatgrass,
willow and cottonwoods are common to the floodplain of the
The near-century of domestic cattle and horse grazing
across the Agate landscape (which ended in 1974) has resulted in a relative forb (e.g., aster, puccoon,
lupine, vetch, phlox)-poor prairie. Burning across the prairie in summer or fall
could promote better forb growth, whereas burning in
the spring would promote growth of grasses.
Fauna
(general)
Agate has a relatively complete inventory of its plant
and animal communities, including its birds (Powell 2000), fish (Stasiak 1990), and mammals, reptiles, and amphibians (Graetz, Garrott and Craven 1995).
The park supports most of the animal species characteristic of the northern
The
Wetlands
and Floodplains
Agate’s riverine
wetlands are recognized by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and are included
in the National Wetland Inventory (http://wfs.sdstate.edu). They are recognized as
wetlands by the State of

Figure 4.
The
Threatened
and Endangered Species
There are no federally or Nebraska-listed threatened
or endangered plant or animal species resident at
State
Listed Rare Plants
The vegetation on public and private Agate park lands
was thoroughly inventoried in the mid-1990s (USGS 1998), and has been part of
the Prairie Cluster Long-Term Ecological Monitoring program since 1995 (Thomas
et al. 2001). During these inventories six species of plants of special
concern, as listed in Table 4, have been identified on Agate fee lands.
Table 4. Nebraska-Listed Plants of Special Concern
|
SPECIES |
COMMON NAME |
|
|
Chenopodium subglabrum (S. Wats.) A. Nels |
Smooth
goosefoot |
S3 |
|
Erigeron
ochroleucus Nutt. |
Buff fleabane |
S2 |
|
Eriogonum cernuum Nutt. |
Nodding wild buckwheat |
S1 |
|
Fritillaria atropurpurea Nutt. |
S2 |
|
|
Phacelia hastata Dougl. ex
Lehm. |
S2 |
|
|
Tripterocalyx micranthus (Torr.) Hook. |
Small-flowered sand verbena |
S1 |
*S1=critically
imperiled, S2=imperiled, S3=rare or uncommon, SU=status undetermined; NNHP 2002
Exotic
Species
Based on all of Agate's plant and animal resource
documentation (NPS 2002a), the park is known to contain 49 exotic plant species
and 11 exotic animal species (10 birds, 1 fish). Of these, only two species (Canada
thistle [Cirsium arvense] and cheatgrass [Bromus tectorum]) are targeted for treatment because of their
relatively wide distribution across the park ecosystem and adverse impacts to
the native vegetation. Canada thistle is listed as a noxious weed in
In 1997 Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) had infested some 125 acres of
park fee lands. The NPS (1999:5) is working toward control of these nonnative
species where they jeopardize native plant communities. An integrated pest
management program was initiated in 1997 to control this exotic weed, including
the establishment of eight insectaries with varying percentages of Ceutorhyncus litura (stem-mining
weevil) and/or Urophora cardui (stem
and shoot gall fly).

Figure 5. Biocontrol Release Sites,
Infested acres outside of the insectaries are mowed
before the set of thistle heads and/or treated with herbicide after the first
killing frost. The program has been documented in Agate's Geographic
Information System data layer and two annual reports (Gray 2002, Howard 2002),
and by 2002 this infestation had been reduced to 25 acres (Knudson 2003).
However, with a wet spring in 2003 the thistle increased its spread to some 50
dispersed low density acres. Fire or mechanical disturbance of the insectaries
in the spring would inhibit initial development of the weevils or galls in the
young thistle plants, and would destroy them in the early summer (June-July)
when they are in the stems. A quick hot fire through these areas in the fall
would probably have only minor adverse impacts, and this would be mitigated in
the gall fly release areas if the galls were harvested prior to burning.
Based on a 2002 field assessment, it was estimated
that some 200 acres of park fee lands were infested with Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass).
This is generally confined to the Hoffman corral areas on the terrace south of
the
Fuel
Load
Since Agate “routinely [has a] continuous cover of [mixed
grass] fuel loads that exceed the minimum necessary to spread fire during late
summer and early fall it is prudent to conclude [it] probably had fire return
intervals of five years or less” (Dodd and Smith 1994). Based on graduate
research by Kyle Wendtland (1993), research
supervisors Dodd and Smith recommended that Agate’s nineteenth century
ecosystem (including the wetlands) could be restored by the managed use of
summer fires, probably in August, with a return interval of five years or less.
Dodd and Smith recommended that if fall burns are used they should be done
every two or three years. While they further recommended that spring burns
should be avoided completely because of adverse impacts on the grassland
communities, this merits reconsideration in the development of specific burn
plans based on detailed vegetation and soils maps.
There are eleven miles of
There has been some reduction of river discharge over
the past 30 years, which researchers in the early 1990s thought could be because
of upriver groundwater withdrawals (Harris, Kondratieff, and Boyle 1991; NPS
1998a:5-10). Groundwater monitoring in the park was initiated in 2003.
The
The average discharge documented by the USGS (Boohar, Hoy, and Steele 1991:42) was 13.6ft.3/s
or 9,850 acre-ft/year, with peak flows February through April and lower flows
July through September. A new
Air Resources
The air resource area of analysis for this fire
management program assessment, given the average wind direction and speed and
local population dispersion discussed below, is
defined as the park and an area approximately five miles in all directions.
Agate has a Remote Access Weather Station (RAWS) that
records hourly temperature, humidity, wind speed,
maximum wind speed, wind direction, precipitation, and fuel stick temperature
and moisture. From July 1997 to September 2002, Agate temperatures ranged from
-22°F. to104°F., with maximum temperatures of 95°F. to 104°F. in June through August.
Minimum temperatures in December through February ranged from -5°F. to the low -22°F. Mean annual precipitation at the park was
10.91", ranging from 12.97" in 1998 to 5.85" in 2002 with most
of it falling from January to August. The prevailing mid-day winds recorded
from 1987 through 2000 were predominantly from the northwest, secondarily in
descending order from the west, southwest, and south, and were only calm 12% of
the time. During the period for which records are presently available at the
park (
A National Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration U. S. Climate Reference Network meteorological station was
installed in the park in late August 2003, and it will eventually provide real
time quality-assured Internet-accessible temperature, wind, and precipitation
data.
The
Air quality and visibility at Agate are good. John Ray
(2002; cf. EPA 2000), NPS Air Quality Specialist, estimates that over the past
five years the ozone levels at Agate have been below the Environmental
Protection Agency’s Primary Standard, with the fourth highest annual daily
eight-hour maximum ozone level being 68-75ppb (85% of the current National
Ambient Air Quality Standards) and the average annual daily one-hour maximum at
87-98ppb (74% of the older Standard).
Smoke from wildland or prescribed
fires could create a localized, short-term air quality and safety concern. The
state of
Agate has had 18-17,000
visitors each of the past three years, who come to see the landscape and its
historic paleontological quarries, and hike the four
miles of pedestrian trails, as much as they do to see the paleontological
and Native American exhibits. Visitor use is projected to be steady or slowly
increasing over the next five to ten years.
Agate has access to emergency
medical support from the Harrison Volunteer Fire Department, or from AirLink and
While Agate has its own fire
engine, fire cache, and red-carded staff, as mentioned previously it has a
General Agreement with the Harrison Rural Fire Protection District (and by
extension of their interagency agreement, with the Harrison Volunteer Fire
Department) for cooperative fire control activities. In Fiscal Years 2001 and
2002 Agate was able to provide some financial support to the
District/Department through the federal Rural Fire Assistance program.
Grass and hay crops are economic
commodities in ranching country, and loss of these through wildfire can have
adverse effects to a ranch’s financial health. Therefore, it is important that
wildfires or prescribed fires that are initiated on the Agate landscape, or
that enter into it with the capability of passing through to private lands, be
controlled on the Federal lands.
Protection and maintenance of
firefighters and any other individuals potentially affected by wildfire or
prescribed fire is a primary objective. This objective is a primary motivator
in developing an Agate Fire Management Plan and individual burn plans.